Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 2 2015 | Page 11

feature difficulty in appreciating that the information must be kept confidential, even if other family members or others close to the physician insist on knowing ‘what is going on’ in relation to the individual’s health; and • Physician reluctance to make a mandatory  report (e.g., an impairment affecting the individual’s ability to drive, or a suspicion of child abuse). When the standard of care has been adversely impacted, this can result in poorer quality health care for the patient. “We understand that these limitations may be frustrating for physicians who only wish to be of assistance to the people they love, but our position is that a physician’s best intentions can result in bad medicine,” said Dr. Carol Leet, College President. Six Things to Know about our draft policy: 1. 2. 3. Defines family members and others close to the physician as having a relationship of such a nature that it would reasonably affect the physician’s professional judgment to provide treatment to that individual. Prohibits physicians from providing treatment for themselves or family members, except in the limited circumstances of a minor condition or emergency and where another qualified health-care professional is not readily available. Advises physicians to carefully consider any other relationships (others close to them) of such a nature that would reasonably affect the physician’s professional judgment and prohibits treatment to those individuals. 4. 5. 6. Advises physicians that relationships can change over time and may need to be reassessed. Advises physicians that treating spouses or sexual/romantic partners beyond the limited exceptions of a minor condition or an emergency, and where another qualified health-care professional is not readily available, is sexual abuse under the RHPA. Clarifie ́ѡ