Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 1 2015 | Page 59

discipline summaries spared the witnesses from having to testify. The Committee reviewed and considered the case law concerning similar cases provided by both counsel for the College and Dr. Powell. The Committee was cognizant that no two cases are alike and each case must be considered on its own facts. The proposed penalty including the suspension of Dr. Powell’s certificate of registration for nine months is fair and just and within the range of prior penalties where a finding of disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional misconduct has been made for similar misconduct. The lengthy suspension serves as a specific deterrent to Dr. Powell and as a general deterrent to the profession as a whole that such behaviour is unacceptable. One purpose of a penalty is to provide for some element of rehabilitation for the member to the extent possible. The Committee expects that by ordering that Dr. Powell undertake both the College’s course in Understanding Boundaries in Managing the Risks Inherent in the Doctor-Patient Relationship and the Collegefacilitated instruction in Ethics, Dr. Powell might gain some insight into the seriousness of his transgressions and prevent further harm to patients in the future. This is an appropriate case for costs. As agreed by the parties, the Committee also ordered that Dr. Powell pay the tariff for one day of hearing in the amount of $4,460. Order The Discipline Committee ordered and directed that: 1.  he Registrar suspend Dr. Powell’s certificate of t registration for a period of nine months, effective immediately. 2.  he Registrar impose the following term, condition t and limitation on Dr. Powell’s certificate of registration: (a)  r. Powell must successfully complete, at his D own expense, the following courses within 12 months of the date of this Order: (i)  he College’s Understanding Boundaries in t Managing the Risks Inherent in the DoctorPatient Relationship; and (ii)  he College-facilitated instruction in Ethics t course. 3. Dr. Powell appear before the panel to be reprimanded. 4. Dr. Powell pay to the College costs in the amount of $4,460, within 30 days of the date of this Order. At the conclusion of the hearing, Dr. Powell waived his right to an appeal and the Committee administered thepublic reprimand. DR. LEONA CONSTANCE RUDINSKAS Practice Location: Toronto Practice Area: Oncology, Hematology and Internal Medicine Hearing Information: Agreed Statement of Facts, Admission, Joint Submission on Penalty (Initially Contested) On December 9, 2013, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. Rudinskas committed an act of professional misconduct, in that she failed to maintain the standard of practice of the profession. Dr. Rudinskas admitted the allegation. Dr. Rudinskas practises oncology, hematology and internal medicine. Patient A Dr. Rudinskas failed to: perform appropriate assessments; round at an appropriate hour; review patient’s condition as documented in her chart and in test results in a timely manner, and to respond in a timely manner to information about her condition; appropriately assess her following a hemoglobin drop; order a CT scan on a ‘stat’ basis in a timely manner; review results of abdominal X-rays demonstrating the existence of a bowel obstruction in a timely manner; diagnose a bowel obstruction in a timely manner; and communicate in a timely manner with the patient’s family. Patient B Patient B, an infant, died of known cardiac congenital abnormalities. In her role as Coroner, Dr. Rudinskas Full decisions are available online at www.cpso.on.ca. Select Doctor Search and enter the doctor’s name. Issue 1, 2015 Dialogue Issue1_15.indd 59 59 2015-03-19 11:18 AM