Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 1 2015 | Page 10

letters to the editor Dear Editor: ... Continued from pg. 9 bral edema and even death. Many children with DKA present to a medical professional within a week of their DKA admission, but symptoms of diabetes are not recognized or pending investigations delay the diagnosis. When diabetes is clinically suspected, preliminary diagnosis can be made on the basis of urine dipstick (glucosuria +/- ketonuria) or finger prick measurement of blood glucose. According to the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) Clinical Practice Guidelines (2013), laboratory testing, such as a random or fasting glucose or a hemoglobin A1C, is not required prior to referral for further evaluation and management. If serum measurements are obtained during the initial evaluation, a random blood sugar ≥ 11.1 mmol/L or a fasting ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, in the presence of diabetes symptoms, are diagnostic. When a diagnosis of diabetes is highly suspected or confirmed, same-day consultation with a specialist is warranted. For very ill children, ER referral and/or admission to a pediatric ICU may be necessary. Initiation of same-day insulin therapy is nearly always warranted, even for well appearing children. For pediatric patients, the Canadian Diabetes Association and pediatric diabetes care providers would generally highlight these key messages: 1.  lassic diabetes symptoms – particularly polyuria or C polydipsia – justify point-of-care screening investigations such as a blood glucose by glucometer or urine dipstick analysis (glucosuria +/- ketonuria). 2.  hen symptomatic diabetes is suspected, laboratory W confirmation is not required prior to consultation. 3.  uspicion of new-onset type 1 diabetes warrants S same-day consultation with a specialist. Sincerely, Mark Inman, MD Pediatric Endocrine Fellow Hospital for Sick Children Mark Palmert, MD Head, Division of Endocrinology Hospital for Sick Children 10 Re: Stolen Prescription Pads (Volume 10, Issue 2, 2014) When I opened my private practice many years ago, I arranged to meet with my lawyer to have notarized specimen signatures for cheques and prescription. The cheque signature was a different combination of initials and written out names. The specimen signatures were written on my office letterhead. The original copy was kept in my safety deposit box. My lawyer and my Power of Attorney each had a copy of the specimen signatures. I chose to do this because my cancelled cheques were in my office in a locked cabinet but if someone stole a prescription pad and a cancelled cheque to forge a signature they would have some difficulty with the prescription. I had duplicate prescriptions that I kept in the patient files but I cut off the area where the signature was on the duplicate and shredded the signature. I must admit that when I opened the office I was shocked at how easy it was to have a prescription pad printed. I walked into the printer and ordered all of my office supplies without having to provide any identification. If I were in practice today, I would hope to have a secure electronic prescription transmission to the patient’s pharmacy. Sincerely, Greta Toni Swart, MD Consulting Psychiatrist, Applied Research and Education, CPRI Omission: In our last issue of Dialogue, we listed the names of all the Ontario physicians who had participated in the activities of medical regulation in the previous year. Unfortunate