Dialogue Volume 10 Issue 3 2014 | Page 7

FROM THE REGISTRAR’S DESK Sharing our data in ways that align with our mandate, priorities A Rocco Gerace, MD Registrar Where we possess information that can lead to improvements, then it should be shared s the medical regulator, the College is in possession of unique information that is much in demand by other organizations. As a result, each year we receive a number of requests asking us to share our data for various purposes. We have never treated these requests lightly. As the custodian of physician information, we have strict obligations that govern decisions to share information. We never allow, for example, the release of information to commercial entities. We are compliant with confidentiality and privacy obligations and we had a policy in place that allowed physicians to opt-out of the release of their public information under certain circumstances. Recently, however, we noticed that the nature of the requests we received for our data were changing and the tools we had relied upon to decide which requests should be granted and which should be denied were no longer sufficient. Earlier this year, Council members stated that the College should contribute data externally for initiatives that will lead to system improvement. Specifically, Council members expressed the desire to see our data shared if the information would improve the quality and continuity of patient care, and has a positive impact on health systems and regulatory processes and outcomes. This direction makes sense. After all, we are an important stakeholder, and where we possess information that can lead to improvements, then it should be shared – once confidentiality provisions are in place, of course. At its meeting in September, Council approved a strategy that will ensure that we share data in ways that align with College priorities and our mandate, while always fulfilling our privacy and confidentiality obligations. The data-sharing strategy includes a vision, an oversight structure and a new decision-making tool. The vision will serve as a principled foundation on which data-sharing will be based. There are two key components to the vision: responsible data stewardship and knowledge contribution. What do we mean by knowledge contribution? For example, in providing information about program data – such as the number of family physicians in a particular municipality or the number of endoscopy procedures performed in out-ofhospital premises – our data could help support government planning and decision making. Knowledge contribution, however, is just one part of the vision that underpins the new data-sharing strategy. The vision also includes a responsible data stewardship com- DIALOGUE • Issue 3, 2014 7