Flow Hijacked
Instead of waiting for proof of collapse, we can ask what has recently become less reachable. Which relationship still has access? What’ s the smallest honest contact that can happen today? Which practical pressure can be reduced? but it is not a validated relapse predictor and should not be presented as one. People are not machines, and earlywarning signals are probabilistic, incomplete and deeply dependent on context.
Still, we can notice changes without claiming certainty. Has the person stopped answering the one contact they usually trust? Has sleep shifted for several nights? Are ordinary commitments becoming harder to start? Is the future horizon shrinking from weeks to hours? Is a lapse being hidden because re-entry feels humiliating? None of these observations diagnoses an outcome. But together they may tell us that the window for a low-friction return is becoming smaller.
For families, peers and services, this suggests a different kind of conversation. Instead of waiting for proof of collapse, we can ask what
CLEAR STEPS AND THE ROUTE BACK
A person should not have to perform complete confidence before receiving a clear next step. Services can make the route back legible – one known contact, a prompt response, language that distinguishes a lapse from total exclusion and an agreed plan for what happens when warning signs appear. Families can decide in advance what support they can offer and what they cannot. Peers can notice narrowing contact without becoming monitors of another adult’ s every move.
The aim is not surveillance. It’ s to preserve options while they can still be used. In my own recovery, structure mattered before I could fully explain why it mattered. Other people sometimes held open a future I could not yet hold open for myself. Over time, that borrowed stability became participation, and participation became a life I could act towards.
I no longer think of recovery mainly as the absence of a substance or behaviour. Abstinence may be essential, but recovery also involves the return of reachable possibility. A phone call can compete with secrecy. Breakfast can compete with chaos. A promise next week can influence a choice tonight. The future gains enough weight to enter the present.
That process is rarely straight. It can strengthen, weaken and strengthen again. Seeing this does not make relapse inevitable, and it does not turn a human life into an equation. It gives us a more useful place to look – not only at the final event, but at the changing relationships among stress, cues, connection, routine, shame and hope. If we can see the narrowing earlier, we may be able to keep one route back within reach.
has recently become less reachable. Which relationship still has access? What’ s the smallest honest contact that can happen today? Which practical pressure can be reduced? What would make returning easier without removing accountability?
To say that behaviour emerges from interacting conditions is not to say that nobody is responsible. Harm remains harm. Families may need boundaries, and safety may require distance or professional help. A compassionate systems view does not ask other people to absorb unlimited damage – it asks whether we can hold responsibility while intervening earlier and designing fewer humiliating barriers to return.
FALSE CONFIDENCE The attraction of systems language is also its danger. A neat score can create false confidence. I have proposed a‘ recovery coupling index’ as a research scaffold for thinking about interacting pressures,
Flow Hijacked
Tomer Avraham is the creator of Flow Hijacked, a free, independent and noncommercial bilingual project that connects lived experience with carefully bounded scientific models. The material is educational and is not a substitute for medical care, diagnosis or crisis support. flowhijacked. com / go / ddn
WWW. DRINKANDDRUGSNEWS. COM OCTOBER 2026 • DRINK AND DRUGS NEWS • 7