that connects help currently scattered across organisations. What makes it valuable is whether it addresses a real gap.
Our manifesto brings evidence and experience together. Research, data and professional knowledge matter. But people’ s experiences can reveal what the data misses, why a pathway fails or why an apparently sensible intervention is difficult to use. Innovation needs that understanding before a solution is chosen, and honest learning once it is tested.
Harm reduction provides the direction – keeping people alive, safer, connected and supported. Kindness shapes the design. How someone is welcomed, listened to and treated is part of how a system works. A response that looks efficient on paper can still fail if people feel judged or unsafe using it.
Our starting point is that people are not the problem – systems can be.
ACROSS BOUNDARIES This journey matters particularly where responsibilities become blurred – between prison and community, treatment and healthcare, housing and homelessness, or referral and appointment. We want to work across those boundaries with people experiencing the gaps and organisations able to help close them. Sometimes Beautiful Monsters will lead; sometimes we will partner or strengthen someone else’ s work. Collaboration over empire building is a deliberate choice. System change requires us to look beyond our own organisational interests.
Our Beautiful Monsters test brings the journey back to its purpose. Did people have meaningful power? Did support become easier to navigate? Were people safer? Did trust improve? Can the change last? Most importantly, did it make things better for people? Those questions apply to our work too. And yes, our planned national provider league table will take that challenge further – making peer influence and accountability visible and encouraging organisations to show how they improve.
We will challenge accepted practice with evidence, experience and kindness, and expect our own assumptions to be challenged. The manifesto invites people, families and partners into that work, with‘ Monster Conversations’ providing space for discussion. Bring a gap, a difficult question or an idea worth testing. Read the manifesto at beautifulmonsters. org and help shape what comes next.
Another meeting is not an outcome. Another strategy is not an outcome. Change is the outcome.
Mark Tudor and George Charlton are the founders of Beautiful Monsters CIC www. beautifulmonsters. org
SEVEN-STEP MODEL
The manifesto’ s seven-step model shows how we intend to move from challenge into action. Its‘ house’ metaphor follows the building of something useful, welcoming and lasting. The foundations are knowledge and shared power; the finished home represents support shaped around local lives. The journey applies to services and wider systems as well as physical places.
First comes peer-led research. People closest to the issue help establish what matters, what works and where the gaps are. This includes paid community inquiry with our sister CIC, We are LUV, or Liberating User Voices, bringing experience together with existing research and data. We begin by understanding the problem before deciding what to build.
Second, peer-led harm reduction steering groups create the structures through which that knowledge can influence decisions. People help guide priorities, challenge assumptions and shape the work as it develops. This gives the journey direction and accountability – those most affected are front and centre and have a continuing role in deciding where it goes.
Third, peer-led harm reduction projects turn understanding into practical interventions. Ideas are tested, their effects evaluated and the approach adapted. This is where innovation becomes something people can use. The question moves from what we think might help to what happens when the response meets people’ s lives.
Fourth, peer ambassadors take that learning into communities, services and decision-making spaces. They help widen involvement and connect local experience with discussions about practice, commissioning and policy. The ambition is for useful learning to influence the conditions around a project, as well as the project itself.
Fifth, communities define what their home should look like. Local needs, strengths and relationships shape the response. A model can provide a method without imposing an identical service everywhere. People and families help determine what belongs in their local response and how the different parts should connect. The response must be shaped by the needs and aspirations of communities, rather than expecting communities to adapt to a predetermined model.
Sixth, we make the house a home. Plans become delivery, with attention to accessibility, culture, relationships and joined-up support. We call these places living rooms: places where people go to live, not die. Their value depends on whether people experience safety, practical help and a sense of belonging when they use them.
Seventh comes sustainability. Funding, workforce development, partnerships and community ownership must support what has been built. A promising project should create capacity that lasts beyond its initial funding. The strongest change should eventually belong to the community, with people able to guide its future.
WWW. DRINKANDDRUGSNEWS. COM NOVEMBER 2026 • DRINK AND DRUGS NEWS • 17