DDN May 2017 DDN March2018 | Page 9

Surveys Connecting through experience DDN welcomed two research teams to ‘Get Connected’, to carry out their surveys in the exhibition area throughout the day. Here each team explains their project’s aims HOW DO YOU RECOVER? An international collaboration, led by Sheffield Hallam University and funded by the National Institute for Health Research, is undertaking a longitudinal study on recovery pathways and societal responses. Called REC-PATH, the project will assess pathways to addiction recovery in England, Scotland, Netherlands and Belgium. We were pleased to attend the DDN Get Connected conference and meet many incredibly strong and brave people in recovery and service providers supporting them. We are delighted with DDN’s support and the partnership that is characteristic of work in this area. Recovery in the UK has been a dominant policy since 2010, and we have witnessed many successes along the road so far. Yet, recovery orientated policies and practices in non-English speaking countries have only recently been introduced and have not been fully implemented. Our study attempts to assess ‘structural’ variations in recovery policy and practice, comparing the UK with the Netherlands and Belgium – countries only beginning to embed a recovery model in substance use policy. The aim is to better understand the impact of UK recovery policy and the early impact of recovery policy in the Netherlands and Belgium by looking at recovery orientated strategies and interventions individuals are engaging with, while addressing more universal questions about mechanisms of behaviour change and life course transitions. We know from the evidence that 58 per cent of people with addiction do recover. Less clear are what mechanisms of change promote recovery in women and in men, and what role policy has on recovery pathways. Our project uses a life-course method to understand what recovery approaches have been beneficial to individuals in different stages of recovery: early (less than one year); sustained (one to five years); and stable (five years and more). From the participants completing the Life in Recovery survey, we will recruit 150 people (fifty in each stage of recovery) in each country. Participants will be ‘We would like to invite you to help build our under - standing of how people recover.’ www.drinkanddrugsnews.com interviewed on two occasions, at baseline and one-year follow-up, with 30 recruited for an in-depth interview at the one-year follow-up. The aim is to assess the role of five Mechanisms Of Behaviour Change for Recovery (MOBCR) and their impact at different stages in the addiction/recovery career. The MOBCRs are: i. natural recovery ii. 12-step mutual aid iii. peer-based recovery support iv. residential treatment v. specialist community treatment We would like to invite you to help build our understanding of how people recover. This is critical to improving recovery policy and practice. Together with people who have overcome an addiction problem, we want to show that recovery from addiction is possible. We want to find out more about your recovery, because sharing your experiences can help other people with an addiction. Please join the recovery community and visit www.rec-path.co.uk for more information about REC-PATH and to complete the Life in Recovery survey. YOUR SAY IN SHAPING TREATMENT SERVICES The Expert Faculty on Commissioning asked about experiences of treatment for problematic opioid use to inform future care planning. The approach to care for people with drug problems or problematic opioid use has improved greatly – progress based on adopting new approaches and innovation. In the future, understanding the views of service users and people in recovery is important in making decisions about care. Results of a survey of the ‘lived experience’ of the drug treatment services are now available. The survey was run by Mark Gilman, former recovery lead at Public Health England, and is the third assessment of the opinions of people involved in this area. Responses highlighted a need for greater patient input in development of personal treatment plans as well as in wider decisions on service provision. Only 33 per cent of participants felt treatment services provide them with choice tailored to their individual needs and goals, while just 26 per cent stated there was effective representation of patient or service user voices in national decisions about care. The survey highlights that service users and people in recovery are keen to participate in the discussion and planning for the future of treatment. Lived experience should inform the future of innovative care for people with problematic opioid use. Let us connect the service users and the people in recovery to the decision-makers and build on what we have, to make future services even better. Detailed results of the 2018 annual survey will be presented at the congress of the Expert Faculty on Commissioning (EXCO) on 22 June in Manchester. More information at www.expertfaculty.org March 2018 | drinkanddrugsnews | 9