Current Pedorthics | September-October 2019 | Vol.51, Issue 5 | Page 54

System for Prediction of Recurrent DFU utility of the study device for evaluating the effects of offloading interventions (e.g., new custom shoes, which should, in theory, reduce pressure at sites of previous ulceration). Further, individual thresholds can be tailored or several used concurrently to customize both the balance between sensitivity and the number of alerts produced as well as the resulting clinical response. Similarly, one potential use of the telemedicine foot mat that has yet to be explored is categorizing various types of temperature patterns and testing the impact of different therapeutic approaches to each. It is conceivable that different pathologies present with different thermometric phenotypes, allowing the thermal data to better inform appropriate care. Future studies should be explored to understand @Shutterstock.com/MangTeng this relationship and impact on clinical practice. This study has three important limitations that should be considered. First, because the study was noninterventional we did not characterize potential reduction of DFU incidence and related costs. The study design was chosen to characterize the accuracy of the study device and notifying clinicians of incipient DFU would have confounded this outcome of interest. Because potential impact of temperature- guided avoidance therapy is already well established, this study was needed to address a gap in existing understanding: namely, what is the trade off between sensitivity and specificity as a function of temperature asymmetry threshold? Future trials on this technology should focus on measuring how the device affects both clinical and financial outcomes, as well as how these effects may be optimized by adjusting system sensitivity and specificity. 52 Pedorthic Footcare Association | www.pedorthics.org