Current Pedorthics | July-August 2019 | Vol.51, Issue 4 | Page 53

Optimization of rocker sole footwear limitation is that we did not compare our group optimized footwear with fully customized footwear, incorporating an extra depth upper along with a customized insole with metatarsal pads and cut outs etc. However, the aim of this study was to specify a group-optimized outsole design and the beneficial effects of other footwear modifications are likely to be additive. Such customized footwear comes at greater cost, and perhaps lower adherence, and seems out of context for the prevention of first ulceration, when most footwear is still sought via a retail route. However, our proposed group-optimized design could be used as a starting point for fully customized footwear if further reductions in pressure were necessary. ABBREVIATIONS MTH: metatarsal head MTP: metatarsophalangeal RA: rocker angle Conclusions By studying the relationship between footwear design features and peak plantar pressure, we have been able to suggest a group-optimized design for plantar pressure reducing footwear. Our data demonstrate that this design can reduce pressures below the 200 kPa threshold in the majority of people with elevated plantar pressure but otherwise at low risk of first ulceration. The results also show that personalized selection of footwear based on collection of plantar pressure data may offer only marginal gains in this population. • PB – Conceived the original idea, designed the study and contributed towards writing of the final manuscript. CJ – Conceived the original idea, designed the study and co-wrote the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements We acknowledge the support we received from the UK Primary Care Research Network who assisted with participant recruitment for this study. Ethics approval and consent to participate This research was carried out with funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), Grant Agreement no. NMP2-SE-2009-229,261. The following statement relating to ethical approval was provided at the start of the methods section “All subjects provided written consent to participate in the study after appropriate ethical approval had been obtained (UK NRES 10/H1013/32).” This statement includes the committee name and reference number. This statement also makes it clear that all subjects provided informed consent. Availability of data and materials Author details The data will not be shared since no informed consent was taken for data sharing other than within the research team. 1 Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, Manchester M6 6PU, UK. 2Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Muengersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany. 3German Research Centre for Elite Sport, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Muengersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany. 4Centre for Health and Integrative Physiology in Space, German Sports University Cologne, Am Sportpark Muengersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany. Funding Authors’ contributions SP – Designed the study, carried out data analysis and co-wrote the final manuscript. JD and BB – Carried out experimental data collection, data analysis and contributed towards writing of the final manuscript. Current Pedorthics | July/August 2019 51