Current Pedorthics | January-February 2019 | Vol.51, Issue 1 | Page 32

Lateral wedges - a crossover study plus arch support resulted in significant improvements in all parameters, whilst the lateral wedges alone did not significantly change any clinical outcome. However, these differences generally did not translate into significant treatment main effects (between conditions), with the exception of timed stair climb, where improvements were significantly greater with the use of the lateral wedges with arch support compared to lateral wedges alone (p=0.02). In addition, a significant period effect (Figs. 2 and 3) was seen for WOMAC Pain scores (p=0.04). There were no intervention by period interactions. Using a minimal clinically important improvement of 17% for WOMAC pain and 12% for WOMAC function [29], use of lateral wedges alone resulted in improved pain in 13 (54%) participants and improved function in 14 (58%) participants. When using the lateral wedges plus arch support, 14 (64%) participants had improved pain while 17 (77%) participants had improved physical function. Wear times were similar between the two treatment periods, whether expressed as absolute or relative time values. The mean (sd) number of hours that participants self-reported insole wear was 150.7 (86.5) hours for the lateral wedges and 152.5 (121.0) hours for the lateral wedges plus arch support over the two-month intervention periods, which equated to 72.5 (19.2)% and 75.8 (24.4)% of total shoe wear time, respectively. There were no differences (p=0.55) in self-reported comfort between the two conditions (lateral wedges=6.4 (2.6) out of 10; lateral wedges plus arch support=6.9 (2.5) out of 10). More participants indicated that they preferred their “first insole” (13/22) 30 Pedorthic Footcare Association | www.pedorthics.org than their “second” (9/22), which translated into more individuals preferring the lateral wedges plus arch support (17/22; of these 17, 10 participants were randomized to the lateral wedges plus arch support first, while the other 7 received the lateral wedges plus arch support second). When asked to report overall change in symptoms compared to baseline, 15 individuals reported improvement with lateral wedges alone (7=“much better”, 8= “slightly better”) while 18 individuals reported improvement with the lateral wedges plus arch support (9=“much better”,9=“slightly better”). A total of 16 unique, yet minor, adverse events were self-reported during the study, 11 of which occurred during lateral wedges wear and five during lateral wedges plus arch support wear. With lateral wedges alone, the most common complaint was onset of foot pain or discomfort (n=3), which lasted between one and three weeks. There were two reports of increased bunion pain, one lasting two weeks and the other for the duration of the intervention. Other complaints included: five weeks of toe cramping (n=1), three weeks of lateral ankle pain (n=1), one week of calf tightness (n=1), generalized lower leg pain lasting three days (n=1), and one report each of lower back and knee pain lasting one and ten weeks, respectively. During lateral wedges plus arch support wear, five individuals reported foot pain or discomfort ranging from two days to two weeks. Finally, three individuals underwent additional treatment during lateral wedges use (two instances of topical pain relief gel and one instance of foot and lower leg massage), while the same two treatments were completed by another two individuals during lateral wedges plus arch support wear.