ORIGINALES:
Escenarios Actuales
2006;18(2):245–62.
7. van de Bovenkamp HM, Zuiderent-Jerak
T. An empirical study of patient participation in
guideline development: Exploring the potential for
articulating patient knowledge in evidence-based
epistemic settings. Heal Expect. 2015;18(5):942–55.
8. Milewa T. Representation and legitima-
cy in health policy formulation at a national level:
Perspectives from a study of health technology eli-
gibility procedures in the United Kingdom. Health
Policy (New York). 2008;85(3):356–62.
9. NICE. Patient and Public Involvement
Policy [Internet]. 2013. Disponible en: https://
www.nice.org.uk/about/nice-communities/
public-involvement
10. Hogg CNL. Patient and public invol-
vement: What next for the NHS? Heal Expect.
2007;10(2):129–38.
11. Fricke FU, Dauben HP. Health technolo-
gy assessment: A perspective from Germany. Vol.
12, Value in Health. 2009.
12.
International
Hospital
Federation,
International Alliance of Patients’ Organisations.
Special collaborative Issue with IAPO on patient
engagement in Hospitals. World Hopsitals Heal
Serv. 2014;50(3).
13. Rivera D, Fernández E, Rengifo A. Manual
Metodológico de Participación y deliberación.
[Internet]. 2014. 1-85 p. Disponible en: http://
www.iets.org.co/Manuales/Manuales/Manual
Participación 30 sep.pdf
14. Ministerio de Salud. Decreto 47
Determina los diagnósticos y tratamientos de alto
costo con sistema de protección financiera de la ley
N° 20.850. Diario oficial de la República de Chile.
2018 Mar 6;16.
15. Matzat J. [Self-help meets science: Patient
participation in guideline development]. Z Evid
Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes [Internet]. 2013;107(4–
5):314–9. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pubmed/23916271
16. Stafinski T, Menon D, Yasui Y. Assessing
the impact of deliberative processes on the views
of participants: Is it “in one ear and out the other”?
Heal Expect. 2014;17(2):278–90.
17. Solomon MZ, Gusmano MK, Maschke
KJ. The ethical imperative and moral challenges
of engaging patients and the public with evidence.
Health Aff. 2016;35(4):583–9.
18. Poddar U, Brownlee S, Stacey D, Volk RJ,
Williams JW, Elwyn G. Patient Decision Aids: A
Case for Certification at the National Level in the
United States. J Clin Ethics. 2015;26(4):306–11.
19. Kieslich K, Ahn J, Badano G, Chalkidou
K, Cubillos L, Hauegen RC, et al. Public partici-
pation in decision-making on the coverage of new
antivirals for hepatitis C. J Health Organ Manag
[Internet]. 2016;30(5):769–85. Disponible en:
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/
JHOM-03-2016-0035
20. Schuldzinski W. Können Patienten ihre
Verantwortung wahrnehmen? Vol. 106, Zeitschrift
fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im
Gesundheitswesen. 2012. p. 213–6.
21. Kaplan RM, Babad YM. Balancing in-
fluence between actors in healthcare decision ma-
king. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11.
22. Lenert L. Transforming healthcare throu-
gh patient empowerment. In: Studies in Health
Technology and Informatics. 2010. p. 159–75.
23. Cleemput I, Christiaens W, Kohn L,
Léonard C, Daue F, Denis A. Acceptability and
Perceived Benefits and Risks of Public and
Patient Involvement in Health Care Policy: A
Delphi Survey in Belgian Stakeholders. Value Heal
[Internet]. 2015;18(4):477–83. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.015
24. Grenz-Farenholtz B, Langner D,
Hohmann E, Verheyen F, Kranich C. [Patient re-
presentatives at the federal state level in Germany
- results of a quantitative survey regarding the
educational needs of patient representatives].
Gesundheitswes (Bundesverband der Ärzte des
Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes [Internet].
2014;76(11):735–41. Disponible en: http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24696370
25. Gilson L. Trust in health care: theore-
tical perspectives and research needs. J Health
Organ Manag [Internet]. 2006;20(5):359–75.
Disponible en: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/
doi/10.1108/14777260610701768
26. Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC,
Han PK, Boss EF, Ofstad EH, et al. Shared de-
cision-making as an existential journey: Aiming
for restored autonomous capacity. Patient Educ
Couns [Internet]. 2016;99(9):1505–10. Disponible
en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.014
27. Mander R, Melender HL. Choice in ma-
ternity: rhetoric, reality and resistance. Midwifery
[Internet]. 2009;25(6):637–48. Disponible en:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.009
28. Solomon J, Knapp P, Raynor DK, Atkin
K. Worlds apart? An exploration of prescribing and
medicine-taking decisions by patients, GPs and local
policy makers. Health Policy (New York) [Internet].
2013;112(3):264–72. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.004
29. Duffett L. Patient engagement: What
67
Cuad Méd Soc (Chile) 2018, 58 (3): 59-68