CTE Newsletter February 2019 | Page 3

Motivation From A Self-Determination Viewpoint By Dr. Andrew Dutra Motivation, the reasons that cause a person to act in a particular way and the processes that initiate, guide, and maintain such behaviors, is a psychological construct that has received a great deal of attention in the research literature. Although a complete review of that body of literature is beyond the scope of this article, attention will be given to a discussion of motivation from an SDT perspective, as this theory is relevant to our role as collegiate educators. SDT was originally developed in an effort to describe how varying levels or degrees of motivation explain the different types of self- determined behavior. Their theory includes intrinsic and extrinsic sources of motivation, the importance of social and cultural factors in affecting an individual’s well being, and the influence of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in fostering highly motivated individuals Within the SDT framework (Figure 1), motivation is viewed uniquely as a continuum that spans from amotivation (lowest level of self-determination, absence of autonomy), through extrinsic motivation, to intrinsic motivation (highest level of self-determination, performing tasks for pleasure and satisfaction). Individuals who are amotivated are far less likely to complete tasks due their perceived lack of relevance/ importance regarding such activities. For example, an amotivated individual is more likely to sit on the couch or play video games rather than study or exercise due to the lack of importance such academic and fitness tasks provide. Extrinsic motivation, at the lower end of the SDT continuum nearest to amotivation, is motivation that comes from a source outside of a person, such as external rewards (e.g., money, medals, trophies, attention, and praise). Behaviors stimulated by an extrinsic source are perceived by individuals as originating outside the individual and their control and are often associated with decreased levels of overall satisfaction and enjoyment, ending once the external rewards diminish. Unique to SDT, extrinsic motivation is postulated to be a multidimensional motivation facet that is further broken down into four levels of behavioral regulation: external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, and integrated regulation. At these varying levels of extrinsic motivation, the amount of internalization and autonomy increases as a person moves through integrated regulation and closer to intrinsic motivation. This differentiation allows for a more detailed and specific understanding of a person’s externally motivated behaviors. In SDT, intrinsic motivation is the highest level of self-determination. To be truly intrinsically motivated, an individual must see the activity as being truly enjoyable and interesting from an internal perspective. Individuals who are truly intrinsically motivated perform action or behaviors for the pleasure and satisfaction that results from participation in a particular activity without any concern for reward or praise. The action performed is rooted in interest and inherent satisfaction. This level of motivation has the greatest level of autonomy and self-determined/self- regulated control, often associated with high levels of personal metacognitive behavior. All in all, by viewing motivation as more than simply internal and external, an educator is able to assist each student on their academic journey moving away from amotivation and extrinsic motivations, towards truly sincere intrinsic motivation. Keeping this mindset at the forefront of an educator’s mind, provides an ability for each student to be viewed as a dynamic individual moving towards perpetual success both within the walls of the classroom and in their lives outside of EFSC. Providing students with transferable tools to be more “gritty” will ultimately benefit them in a professional setting as well. Figure 1. Self-Determination Theory. Graphical schematic representation of Self-Determination Theory by Sanli, Patterson, Bray, and Lee, 2012, p. 2. Page 3