C&T Publications Eye on Fine Art Photography - August 2014 | Page 40

Is Graffiti Art?
By Robert William Hall

Graffiti artists across the globe today express their thoughts in multi-coloured displays on all surfaces around us. However one could
claim that it is visually impairing and the laws against it are not strict enough, as people's properties are unwillingly defaced.
Therefore to what extent can graffiti be considered art?
On one hand graffiti by definition can be considered art; a personal visual perspective is created by producing something beautiful or
extraordinary. Graffiti artists take much time and effort in practicing technique, covering portfolios prior to visually entertaining the
public, devoting countless hours in contrast to some 'art' on display at the Tate Modern. For example murals are painted in memory
of respected people and events on places such as the Berlin Wall to improve our landscape and remind passersby. In addition art is an
output of feelings and emotions which can express and inform particular issues of society.
'Banksy's' politically satirical pieces share a conscious of many less risk taking, thrill seeking bystanders. He has beautified walls in
the Gaza strip because it improves the scenery, like abandoned buildings and railways that would otherwise remain bland and ugly.
Furthermore, graffiti is a symbol of freedom. Freedom of speech is a right people have died for. Graffiti artists risk everything for
their visualizations to be expressed, acknowledging that prosecution is a certainty if caught. Surely other crimes facing our world
today warrant more focus?
On the other hand graffiti is vandalism and is illegal for many reasons. Aggravation and annoyance are caused by vandals destroying
private property without consent. For instance, places of worship in poorer areas are canvases for these CFC emitters, in turn
offending countless religious communities. Imagine how the 'artist' would feel if their property were devalued and ruined with their
own tools. Why shouldn't these artists use their talent in much more constructive ways?
37