Creating Profit Through Alliances - business models for collaboration E-book | Page 76

Finally, the actual alignment of interfaces and tasks should be considered. The most important compatibilities can often be identified, such as hardware requirements for a software system, or the maximum weight of a component for an aircraft. But who is responsible for making sure two software systems can be operated on a single hardware system simultaneously, or for the weight distribution of an aircraft and the implications for its construction? One party shall have to act as system integrator or quality safeguard. This, too, justifies a price premium. However, each contract provision that assigns part of the risk elsewhere requires a corresponding reduction of this premium. Parties engaging in collaborative offering will need to confer closely concerning the total sum of risk premiums and margins. The simple fact of collaborating must not cause the partnership to price itself out of the market. On the other hand, having a deficit on the joint budget is as good as a guarantee that tensions will arise in the companies' relationship. Capgemini With over 100,000 employees, Capgemini is one of the largest providers of consulting, technology, outsourcing, and local professional services. With the mission statement “Driving Concrete Business Results”, the company helps customers transform their organisation and improve performance. The main activity is the implementation of hardware and software solutions. Capgemini is one of Oracle's most important implementation partners. Balt Leenman, one of Capgemini's alliance managers, has long been involved in this relationship. Back in 2004 he was selling Peoplesoft solutions, before it was taken over by Oracle. He saw the potential of this takeover, wrote an article about it and was invited by Oracle to visit San Francisco. Since then he has been involved in managing this alliance. “Within Capgemini, the alliance with Oracle is seen as a role model. Oracle was recently declared „Overall partner of the year‟ for the second time, beating system integrators like Accenture, Deloitte, IBM, Logica and Ordina”, Balt Leenman explains. “But we do not want to focus solely on one or two vendors. We want to be an independent system integrator that 74 can offer a client impartial advice. In outsourcing we tend to work more with IBM, in enterprise resource planning systems with Oracle and SAP, and in hardware with IBM and HP. Although, since the takeover of Sun, Oracle is a good option as well.” The alliance owes its success to the complementary cultures of the companies. “Oracle is very sales driven, while Capgemini understands the a customer‟s business challenge. The Oracle sales organisation focuses on quarterly results, Capgemini is more long-term oriented. For a large client such as KPN, Oracle deploys several salespeople, each pursuing his or her own targets. We wanted to implement Oracle middleware and had organised workshops with the client for that purpose, but that was frowned upon by the Oracle ERP salesman because it could influence his sales cycle. There lies a role for Capgemini and our alliance management.” In his opinion, a collaboration becomes effective if both partners work from a joint value proposition that serves the customer. “We can enhance our success by fully understanding Oracle‟s solution and its roadmap.