Creating Profit Through Alliances - business models for collaboration E-book | Page 43

physical distribution, and in case of services the costs of matters such as quality inspections and idle time/unused hours of personnel. If two businesses decide to collaborate in their offering, this yields even more value for the customer. Provided all is specified properly, it offers the customer a contractual guarantee that the two firms' products or services are compatible, and that he is saved from having to coordinate the delivery. He is furthermore purchasing from a larger entity, which offers greater delivery assurance. This may prompt the collaborating firms to increase the prices, or it can enable them to bid on orders that would otherwise be beyond reach. Here again, the alternative is to calculate what a company would have to do in order to offer the entire product, if at all feasible. In purchasing and reselling part of the offer, the company must either run greater risks, or must pay a higher price to cover those risks. Moreover, such a construction often lays claim to working capital, since suppliers generally wish to be paid for their part before the customer pays for the whole. Determining the value of collaborative offering is generally independent of the chosen legal framework. It can be done through contractual collaboration, or in the form of a new legal entity. Chapter 5 will look at this more closely. The most important variance in calculating the value concerns the risk of having to pay a substantial customer claim, whether or not jointly with the other partners. However, under normal circumstances this risk ought not to dominate the scenario when entering into collaboration. Global Workspace Alliance Getronics is one of the largest IT service providers in Europe and has been part of the telecom operator KPN since 2007. It was split off from Geveke Electronics and taken to the Dutch stock exchange by Ton Risseeuw in 1983 and grew rapidly in the nineties through various acquisitions. In 2001 Getronics took over Wang Global, but was affected heavily by the collapse of the internet bubble and the financial construction. Getronics shrank from 35,000 employees in 35 countries to 13,000 employees in 13 countries and tried to sell as many assets as possible, to be able to keep on refinancing debt made to buy Wang Global. The rapid shrinkage had a major impact on servicing large internationally active companies like Shell. Competition with IBM, HP/EDS and CSC was strong, and just having field service partners in countries around the world was not a convincing way to proceed. A new model was needed with better aligned partners. Selling off a number of countrybased organisations, in a number of cases Getronics retained a minority share. This made it attractive for Getronics to collaborate with these specific companies and to jointly strive for growth. The alliance was formalised in early 2009, with Compucom in the U.S., Service One Getronics in China, Getronics Middle East, Tecnocom in Spain and South America, NTT Data Getronics in Japan and APX in France. The fact that companies in China, the Middle East and Japan continued to carry „Getronics‟ in their name was a provision made during the sale of the companies, but aside from Getronics' minority share, these are independent companies. 41