Undermining Public Health: How Funding Cuts Threaten the Fight Against Lung Cancer
“Undermining them in the midst of a shutdown by terminating experts and freezing essential funding risks irreparable harm to the systems that protect every American community.”
As government shutdowns and funding freezes ripple across vital agencies, programs designed to detect, prevent, and treat lung cancer — especially those tied to environmental causes like radon exposure—stand at risk of collapse. The harm extends beyond budgets; it erodes trust, stalls progress, and costs lives.
Lung Cancer: A Preventable Tragedy
Lung Cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, claiming over 21,000 lives every year. What makes many of these deaths particularly tragic is that a significant portion are preventable. Radon gas—a colorless, odorless radioactive gas that seeps from soil into homes—is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking
and the number one cause among nonsmokers.
Efforts to test for and mitigate radon rely heavily on consistent funding, technical expertise, and public education. State radon programs, funded primarily through the State Indoor Radon Grant (SIRG), provide testing kits, mitigation support, and educational outreach. When such programs are frozen or terminated, entire communities are left without guidance or protection.
The Consequences of Defunding Expertise
Cutting funding or terminating positions within public health agencies is not a mere budgetary decision—it dismantles systems built over decades. These experts are not easily replaced. They maintain databases of radon test results, certify mitigation professionals, and drive outreach that informs millions of homeowners.
A single shutdown can delay state testing campaigns, stall research studies on radon-linked lung cancer, and block grants to underserved communities. Without this infrastructure, we risk a resurgence of avoidable deaths caused by ignorance and inaction.
A False Economy: The Cost of Neglect
Some policymakers view these cuts as temporary fiscal measures, but the economic cost of lung cancer far outweighs the savings from reduced funding. Treating lung cancer costs billions annually in healthcare expenditures and lost productivity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that radon-related lung cancers alone cost the U.S. economy more than $2 billion each year.
By contrast, radon testing and mitigation are inexpensive, one-time interventions that prevent suffering, save lives, and preserve family stability. A test can cost less than $30; a mitigation system, a few thousand dollars. When experts and programs are terminated, so is our nation’s ability to invest in prevention over reaction.
Communities Left Vulnerable
Freezing essential public health funding has the most severe impact on rural, tribal, and low-income communities, where access to radon testing and lung cancer screening is already limited. In these areas, residents may go years without knowing they live in homes exceeding the EPA’s action level of 4 pCi/L.
When funding is halted, radon awareness campaigns go silent, screening programs shut down, and the chain of prevention breaks. For many, the first time they hear the word “radon” is after a stage IV lung cancer diagnosis—far too late for prevention.
Rebuilding Trust and Protection
To protect Americans, we must treat public health infrastructure as a national security priority. This means maintaining continuous funding for lung cancer prevention programs, safeguarding expert staff positions, and ensuring that public education campaigns are not subject to political tides.
Restoring these systems requires bipartisan leadership and public accountability. The cost of inaction is not just financial—it’s human. Every cut, every delay, every frozen grant translates to lives lost that could have been saved.
Conclusion: Prevention Is Non-Negotiable
When we undermine the very people and programs that stand between Americans and preventable disease, we gamble with our collective future. Public health does not pause for politics. It depends on continuity, expertise, and trust.
To end preventable deaths from lung cancer, we must uphold our commitment to science, funding, and compassion—even in times of uncertainty. Because once those systems collapse, rebuilding them is far harder—and the damage, often, irreversible.
From the Editor
Continued on page 15 ...
Efforts to test for and mitigate radon rely heavily on consistent funding, technical expertise, and public education. State
radon programs, funded primarily through the State Indoor Radon Grant (SIRG), provide testing kits, mitigation support, and educational outreach. When such
programs are frozen or terminated, entire communities are left without guidance or protection.
The Consequences of Defunding Expertise
Cutting funding or terminating positions within public health agencies is not a mere budgetary decision—it dismantles systems built over decades. These experts are not easily replaced. They maintain databases
of radon test results, certify mitigation professionals, and drive outreach that informs millions of homeowners.
A single shutdown can delay state testing campaigns, stall research studies on radon-linked lung cancer, and block grants to underserved communities. Without this infrastructure, we risk a resurgence of avoidable deaths caused by ignorance
and inaction.
A False Economy: The Cost of Neglect
Some policymakers view these cuts as temporary fiscal measures, but the economic cost of lung cancer far
outweighs the savings from reduced funding. Treating lung cancer costs billions annually in healthcare expenditures and lost productivity.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that radon-related lung cancers alone
cost the U.S. economy more than $2
billion each year.
By contrast, radon testing and mitigation are inexpensive, one-time interventions that prevent suffering, save lives, and preserve family stability. A test can cost less than $30; a mitigation system, a few thousand dollars. When experts and programs are terminated, so is our nation’s ability to invest in prevention over reaction.
Communities Left Vulnerable
Freezing essential public health funding has the most severe impact on rural, tribal, and low-income communities, where access to radon testing and lung cancer screening is already limited. In these areas, residents may go years without knowing they live in homes exceeding the EPA’s action level of 4 pCi/L.
When funding is halted, radon awareness campaigns go silent, screening programs shut down, and the chain of prevention breaks. For many, the first time they hear the word “radon” is after a stage IV lung cancer diagnosis—far too late for prevention.
Rebuilding Trust and Protection
To protect Americans, we must treat public health infrastructure as a national security priority. This means maintaining continuous funding for lung cancer prevention programs, safeguarding expert staff positions, and ensuring that public education campaigns are not subject to political tides.
Restoring these systems requires bipartisan leadership and public accountability. The cost of inaction is not just financial—it’s human. Every cut, every delay, every frozen grant translates to lives lost that could have been saved.
Conclusion: Prevention Is Non-Negotiable
When we undermine the very people and programs that stand between Americans and preventable disease, we gamble with our collective future. Public health does not pause for politics. It depends on continuity, expertise, and trust.
To end preventable deaths from lung cancer, we must uphold our commitment to science, funding, and compassion—even in times of uncertainty. Because once those systems collapse, rebuilding them is far harder—and the damage, often, irreversible.
9
Efforts to test for and mitigate radon rely heavily on consistent funding, technical expertise, and public education. State
radon programs, funded primarily through the State Indoor Radon Grant (SIRG), provide testing kits, mitigation support, and educational outreach. When such
programs are frozen or terminated, entire communities are left without guidance or protection.
The Consequences of Defunding Expertise
Cutting funding or terminating positions within public health agencies is not a mere budgetary decision—it dismantles systems built over decades. These experts are not easily replaced. They maintain databases
of radon test results, certify mitigation professionals, and drive outreach that informs millions of homeowners.
A single shutdown can delay state testing campaigns, stall research studies on radon-linked lung cancer, and block grants to underserved communities. Without this infrastructure, we risk a resurgence of avoidable deaths caused by ignorance
and inaction.
A False Economy: The Cost of Neglect
Some policymakers view these cuts as temporary fiscal measures, but the economic cost of lung cancer far
outweighs the savings from reduced funding. Treating lung cancer costs billions annually in healthcare expenditures and lost productivity.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that radon-related lung cancers alone
cost the U.S. economy more than $2
billion each year.
By contrast, radon testing and mitigation are inexpensive, one-time interventions that prevent suffering, save lives, and preserve family stability. A test can cost less than $30; a mitigation system, a few thousand dollars. When experts and programs are terminated, so is our nation’s ability to invest in prevention over reaction.
Communities Left Vulnerable
Freezing essential public health funding has the most severe impact on rural, tribal, and low-income communities, where access to radon testing and lung cancer screening is already limited. In these areas, residents may go years without knowing they live in homes exceeding the EPA’s action level of 4 pCi/L.
When funding is halted, radon awareness campaigns go silent, screening programs shut down, and the chain of prevention breaks. For many, the first time they hear the word “radon” is after a stage IV lung cancer diagnosis—far too late for prevention.
Rebuilding Trust and Protection
To protect Americans, we must treat public health infrastructure as a national security priority. This means maintaining continuous funding for lung cancer prevention programs, safeguarding expert staff positions, and ensuring that public education campaigns are not subject to political tides.
Restoring these systems requires bipartisan leadership and public accountability. The cost of inaction is not just financial—it’s human. Every cut, every delay, every frozen grant translates to lives lost that could have been saved.
Conclusion: Prevention Is Non-Negotiable
When we undermine the very people and programs that stand between Americans and preventable disease, we gamble with our collective future. Public health does not pause for politics. It depends on continuity, expertise, and trust.
To end preventable deaths from lung cancer, we must uphold our commitment to science, funding, and compassion—even in times of uncertainty. Because once those systems collapse, rebuilding them is far harder—and the damage, often, irreversible.