CR3 News Magazine 2025 VOL 3: JUNE MEDICAL EDITION | Page 27

Adequate funding is crucial for promoting health equity and ensuring diverse representation in clinical trials. The NCI has established programs, such as the Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities( CRCHD), to address these issues. If funding remains flat or is reduced, the results might include:
Reduced Support for Underrepresented Researchers. Initiatives like the Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences( CURE) and the Intramural Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences( iCURE) provide training and mentorship to researchers from underrepresented backgrounds. Funding reductions could limit opportunities for these individuals, hindering efforts to diversify the scientific workforce.
Decreased Diversity in Clinical Trial Participation. Financial constraints may remove resources dedicated to recruiting diverse participants for clinical trials. This lack of representation can result in treatments that are less effective or have unforeseen side effects in certain populations, exacerbating existing health disparities.
Exacerbation of Health Disparities. Without targeted research addressing the unique needs of diverse populations, existing health disparities are likely to widen. This can lead to unequal access to advancements in cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
Economic Considerations
When budgets remain static despite rising costs, the real value of funding diminishes, forcing difficult decisions that may leave promising projects unsupported. This scarcity of resources heightens competition for funding from major organizations, which can potentially adversely innovative approaches and discourage new researchers. Furthermore, the substantial expenses associated with establishing and maintaining research facilities place additional strain on already tight budgets, potentially delaying advancements in cancer treatment and prevention.
Inflation and the Effect of a " Flat " Budget. Maintaining a flat budget in nominal terms does not account for inflationary pressures. For example, the NCI ' s FY 2025 budget remains at the FY 2024 level of $ 7.22 billion 1, but inflation erodes purchasing power, effectively reducing the real value of funding. This scenario necessitates difficult choices, such as prioritizing certain grants over others, potentially leaving promising research unfunded.
Increased Competition for Limited Funding. With a shrinking pool of available funds, the competition for NCI grants intensifies. This heightened competition can result in the exclusion of innovative and high‐potential research projects, as only a fraction can be supported. The increased pressure may also discourage early‐career researchers from pursuing independent research paths.
Cost of Establishing and Maintaining Research Laboratories. Setting up a cancer research laboratory involves substantial financial investment. Estimates suggest that establishing a clinical laboratory can range from $ 170,000 4 to over $ 1 million 5. Ongoing operational costs, including personnel salaries, equipment maintenance, and consumables, further strain limited budgets. Reduced NCI funding exacerbates these challenges, potentially leading to downsizing or closure of research facilities.
NCI’ s Future And The Role Of Political Advocacy