CPABC Industry Update Winter 2015 | Page 12

CPA Practical Experience...(cont’d) that have been approved by CPABC in advance, the reporting and assessment process is more streamlined. However, on a periodic basis, programs are monitored to ensure they continue to meet the needs of employers, future CPAs, and the profession. e • nsuring that future CPAs selfassess and document their experience in the PERT; p • roviding future CPAs with time away from the office so they can write examinations; c • ertifying completion of future CPAs’ experience at the end of 30 months; and Employers Employers are not limited to meeting their staffing needs through only one training route. The PPR and EVR are complementary and can run in tandem. If an organization hires at least one future CPA on a regular basis, then the PPR offers an appropriate training avenue because it: is •  more efficient due to the streamlined reporting requirements; o • ffers employers the certainty that future CPAs will complete their technical competency requirements within 30 months; p • rovides employers with control over who is in the program; and is •  a powerful recruiting tool. There is no direct cost to obtaining and maintaining approval, but employers need to commit to: a • ppointing a senior-level CPA to oversee the program; p • roviding an ethical work p • artnering with CPA to monitor the program. Programs can be structured in diverse ways to ensure staffing needs are met, and employers may choose to implement multiple programs simultaneously. In a public accounting firm environment, programs can be structured so that candidates meet the public accounting requirements upon certification or soon a