CPABC in Focus July/August 2015 | Page 25

Did they actually intend to sign this draft or did they have a change of heart? Was the draft incorrect? And what about a typed and signed note left instead of a Will—was it written under duress or perhaps even forged? New division of assets if someone dies intestate In the past, many a bereft spouse received less under an intestacy than if they’d actually divorced their now-deceased spouse. For example, if the deceased had more than one surviving child from various relationships, the surviving spouse would receive only the first $65,000 from the deceased’s estate, as well as the right to live in the family home for life and a third of whatever else was left. Now, however, the surviving spouse inherits the first $150,000 from the estate if the deceased spouse had children from a prior relationship, or $300,000 if they shared the same children; in both instances, the surviving spouse also receives at least 50% of the remaining assets. And while the survivor no longer automatically gains the right to reside in the family home for life, they do get the right to purchase it or take it as a share of the inheritance. Moreover, if they can’t afford to buy the home outright, the court can now allow the surviving spouse to continue living in the home and pay interest to the other heirs on the portion of the house that the surviving spouse couldn’t afford to purchase. All the same, this solution is probably not what most families would desire, particularly in the case of a first marriage with children, where the surviving spouse commonly receives everything under a Will. For one thing, this division of assets has the potential to trigger tax that could have been deferred through a spousal rollover if there had been a Will leaving everything to the spouse or to a qualifying Spousal Trust. As the intestacy rules will still apportion part of the estate to the children, most of the assets allocated to the children would trigger taxes on the deceased’s terminal tax return—taxes that would otherwise have been avoided. This can be particularly devastating if, for example, the deceased was the sole owner of rental or vacation property or the sole shareholder of a successful corporation. Moreover, the new rules still leave the Public Trustee in charge of administering any assets received by minor and/or at-risk heirs; this also means the assets will be distributed directly to the minor heirs when they turn 19. Judges now able to order estates to pay maintenance to spouses and/or children The current provisions provide a clear framework that explains how someone can apply for support and outlines options regarding how the support is to be paid. Time will tell To say that WESA had made wholesale changes to the world of Wills and estates in British Columbia is an understatement. While the next few years will reveal how the new provisions play out in practice, the early consensus is that the benefits should far outweigh the challenges. YOU SEE A DREAM PROPERTY we see its real value Want to know the value of a property before buying or selling? Bring an AIC-designated appraiser on board to help make your investment decision. AACI and CRA appraisers are real estate experts, providing reliable, independent and unbiased appraisals on all property types based on current and emerging market trends. When property is involved, involve us. Valuations appraisal reView Consulting Feasibility studies due diligenCe Find a real estate appraiser in your area by visiting online now. aicanada.ca/British-columbia CPABC in Focus • July/August 2015  25