CosmoBiz Magazine August 2019 Issue | Page 39

Is there anything you think consumers should know, or look for in regards to the topic? One of the quickest ways to look for greenwashing is the word “wildcrafted.” Real wildcrafting is when an herbalist goes to a forest and harvests a small amount of a plant for a remedy. Wildcrafting has to be done very carefully to avoid wiping out native plant populations. But when you see the word “wildcrafted” on a label, remember that it can take hundreds to over a thousand pounds of plant material to make a single pound of essential oil. If you really wildcrafted that much, you would have destroyed an entire plant population for many miles in every direction. Luckily, commercial wildcrafting for cosmetics isn’t actually happening, but it does clue you in that the company is greenwashing. The word “wildcrafted” is typically used when a company doesn’t have an organic certification for the ingredient, but they want to make their ingredient sound greener. Another greenwashing trick is “Organic Aloe Juice” as the first ingredient. This ingredient is simply water with a trace amount of organic aloe powder added to it. Companies do this because the word “water” does not count toward the percentage of organic material. A product that claims to be “80% Organic” that lists “Organic Aloe Juice” as the first ingredient may just be 80% water with a pinch of aloe powder thrown in. What Else Can Consumers Do? As you may have noticed, the world of greenwashing is complicated from the top down. Whether it’s the wealth of information a consumer needs to ponder when wandering the aisles of their preferred beauty story. Or the company trying to create a product that is in line with their beliefs but also financially feasible. Or the Chemist working between the two—it’s a tricky subject. While the best suggestion is to learn about ingredients, that’s not always easy, we suggest checking out these tips from the Greenwashing Index. THE AD MISLEADS WITH WORDS. Do you believe the ad misleads the viewer/reader about the company’s/product’s environmental impact through the things it says? Does it seem the words are trying to make you believe there is a green practice when there isn’t? Focus on the words only — what do you think the ad is saying? THE AD MISLEADS WITH VISUALS AND/OR GRAPHICS. Do you think the advertiser has used green or natural images in a way designed to make you think the product/company is more environmentally friendly than it really is? THE AD MAKES A GREEN CLAIM THAT IS VAGUE OR SEEMINGLY UNPROVABLE. Does the ad claim environmental benefits without sufficiently identifying for you what they are? Has the advertiser provided a source for claims or for more information? Are the claims related to the company/product? THE AD OVERSTATES OR EXAGGERATES HOW GREEN THE PRODUCT/COMPANY/ SERVICE ACTUALLY IS. Do you believe the advertiser is overstating how green the product/company actually is? Are the green claims made by the ad believable? Do you think it’s possible for the product/company to do the things depicted/stated? THE AD LEAVES OUT OR MASKS IMPORTANT INFORMATION, MAKING THE GREEN CLAIM SOUND BETTER THAN IT IS. Do you think the ad exists to divert attention from something else the company does? Do you believe the relevant collateral consequences of the product/service are considered in the ad? Does it seem to you that something is missing from the ad? THE AD MISLEADS WITH WORDS. Do you believe the ad misleads the viewer/reader about the company’s/product’s environmental impact through the things it says? Does it seem the words are trying to make you believe there is a green practice when there isn’t? Focus on the words only — what do you think the ad is saying? 39