at his desk- would pause during the quiet evening hours to ask how I was settling in. During one of these moments, he said something I’ ve never forgotten:“ If we’ re not serious about work ethic and character, then we’ re not serious about results.” That statement has stayed with me. It captured the idea that performance and integrity are inseparable- and that culture, grounded in values, is what gives strategy its legs.
Compliance failures also become more likely in fear-based or indifferent cultures. When employees hesitate to report issues or feel it’ s not safe to challenge the status quo, early warning signs are missed- sometimes with costly regulatory and reputational consequences.
And with the leadership landscape shifting, the urgency to evolve culture has never been greater.
The Changing Leadership Demographic and Its Cultural Implications
We’ re in the midst of a leadership shift. Millennials and Gen Zs are moving into senior roles, bringing with them values rooted in transparency, purpose, inclusion, and digital fluency. These leaders want workspaces that prioritize mental wellness, flexibility, and social responsibility. Increasingly, they’ re also choosing to leave behind- or“ ghost”- toxic physical workplaces, seeking environments where culture aligns with their values, rather than tolerating unhealthy, outdated organizational norms.
My son, an advocate, shared with me that he has come across several cases where law pupils( millennials and Gen Zs), after completing their pupilage at certain firms, have been unwilling to join those law firms on employment terms due to the toxic work environments they experienced during their pupilage. Instead, they choose to embark on job hunting, seeking out organizations that align with their values and beliefs.
Much like the observation my son shared with me, I’ ve witnessed organizations lose emerging talent simply because outdated systems resisted new ways of thinking.
This generational transition presents both opportunity and risk. On one hand, these new leaders are more attuned to stakeholder expectations. On the other, if institutional culture doesn’ t evolve, tensions arise.
In my own leadership journey, I’ ve come to see that culture isn’ t just shaped by people- it’ s also shaped by the tools we use and the changes we face. One of the most significant shifts we’ re navigating today is the rise of Artificial Intelligence. At first glance, it might seem like a purely technical matter, but the truth is, AI raises deeply human questions: Are our systems fair? Are we unintentionally reinforcing bias? Are people still being treated with dignity when decisions are driven by data?
When tech decisions are made without cultural oversight, bias and ethical blind spots become systemic risks. In organizations where culture is already strained or toxic, introducing AI without intention can make things worse- reducing people to numbers, widening gaps in trust, and hiding prejudice behind a screen of“ objectivity.” But in a healthy, risk-aware culture, AI becomes an opportunity to do better- to design systems that reflect our values, to question assumptions, and to lead with both curiosity and caution.
As leaders, we need to stay awake to these tensions. It’ s not just about keeping up with technology; it’ s about ensuring that as our tools evolve, our humanity doesn ' t get lost in the process.
Sustaining Healthy Culture in a Rapidly Changing Environment
Building and sustaining a healthy culture isn’ t a one-time project or a box to tick after a leadership retreat. It requires daily effort, consistent behavior, and active leadership. As Ben Horowitz wisely puts it,“ Culture is not a one-off event. It ' s the habits, the behaviors, and the language that get repeated every day. If you’ re not intentionally shaping it, it’ s shaping you- and not always in the way you want.” Culture is always evolving- the question is whether it’ s evolving intentionally, or by default. In risk-intelligent organizations, this means staying alert not only to external threats, but also to internal habits that can quietly erode trust, integrity, and psychological safety.
Sustaining culture starts with embedding it into daily practices and microbehaviors. Rituals- like how meetings begin, how decisions are communicated, or how leaders respond to failure- send signals about what matters. A simple act, like inviting challenge in a team huddle or taking time to acknowledge a team member who upheld a value under pressure, reinforces the culture more powerfully than grand gestures.
Organizations should also use structured tools to assess and adjust culture regularly. Pulse surveys, for instance, are short, frequent questionnaires that capture real-time sentiment and engagement. 360-degree reviews provide rounded insights by capturing feedback from peers, supervisors, and subordinates. Cultural heat maps visually highlight where culture is strong or where values may be drifting. But insight alone isn’ t enough- feedback must lead to visible change. When employees see action tied to their input, trust is strengthened, and the culture becomes more resilient.
Another daily lever is recognition. Not just celebrating what gets done, but how it’ s done. Recognize those who collaborate across silos, challenge groupthink respectfully, innovate with purpose, or uphold ethics even under pressure. This tells people that values aren’ t just slogans- they’ re part of how success is defined.
In my experience, during times of change or pressure, leadership behavior becomes culture’ s most visible signal. That’ s why consistency matters. As leaders, when we communicate clearly, act with integrity, and stay present- especially in moments of uncertainty- we reinforce cultural stability. I’ ve found that even simple, authentic storytelling makes a difference. When we highlight how a team responded ethically to a setback, or how someone stood up for a colleague, we translate values from abstract ideals into lived behavior. These stories don’ t need to be dramatic- they just need to be true.
Importantly, periods of crisis or transition- mergers, restructures, digital shifts- are more than operational milestones. They’ re cultural stress tests. In fragile environments, these events magnify fear, suppress dialogue, and unravel trust. But in healthy, values-aligned organizations, they become chances to deepen cohesion and renew purpose.
Ultimately, cultural leadership is a risk discipline. It is how we future-proof our organizations- not just with strategy and structure, but with clarity, consistency, and care in how we lead every day.
Addressing Toxic Culture: A Structured Risk Response
Once toxic patterns are identified, organizations need more than awareness- they need a roadmap. Here’ s how I’ ve seen transformation take root.
In my engagements with colleagues and leadership teams, I’ ve seen how damaging toxic culture can be. It undermines not just people, but performance, trust, and longterm reputation. Yet many organizations
10 MAL66 / 25 ISSUE