Controversial Books | Page 70

48 The Constitution’s Deep Roots Ranking of Political Thinkers by Frequency of Citation and by Decade 1760s 1770s 1780s 1790s 1800–1805 Total Montesquieu Blackstone Locke Hume Plutarch Beccaria Cato Delolme Pufendorf Coke Cicero Hobbes subtotal Others total 8 1 11 1 1 0 1 0 4 5 1 0 33 67 100 7 3 7 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 25 75 100 14 7 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 37 63 100 4 11 1 6 2 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 29 71 100 1 15 1 5 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 0 32 68 100 8.3 7.9 2.9 2.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 32.4 67.6 100.0 total citations examined 216 544 1306 674 414 3154 All numbers except those in the last column are rounded to the nearest whole. Source: Donald Lutz, A Preface to American Political Theory (Lawrence: Kansas University Press, 1992), 138. Rousseau (the patron saint of French revolutionaries), or subscribed to the views of Helvetius, Turgot, or Condorcet. Holbach’s System of Nature (1773), an attack on religion and government anticipating in many respects the ideas of Karl Marx, seems to have had few if any followers in the American colonies. Many of the French works, in fact, had not been translated into English. The single great exception was Charles Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws (1748), one of the most widely read and frequently cited authorities relied upon by the Americans in framing a new system of government. Montesquieu did not advocate utopian solutions to the problem of despotism in his age. He favored constitutional reform. His practical aim was to analyze the constitutional conditions upon which freedom depends, in the