Controversial Books | Page 417

The Constitution Limits and Distributes Power 395 federal, one house resting on a national and the other on a federal basis. The presidency was also partly national and partly federal, since the electoral vote was distributed partly in accordance with the principle of State equality, and partly according to population. Considering the operation of the government, it was seen as national rather than federal, inasmuch as it acted directly on individuals and not through the States. In the extent of its powers, however, the Union was federal because its jurisdiction was limited to specific objects, and all else was left to the States. Thus the government of the United States was to be neither a pure confederacy nor a ‘‘consolidated republic,’’ but a new type of government, in a class by itself. The States had not been reduced to provinces, the Federalists insisted, but remained in possession of ‘‘certain exclusive and very important portions of sovereign power.’’ They still held ‘‘all the rights of sovereignty which were not . . . exclusively delegated to the United States.’’ In a consolidated system, the local authorities are subject to control by the central government; but in the proposed Union the local authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject to the general authority than the general authority is to them within its own sphere.’’ The States may not be completely sovereign, but they did have a residuary sovereignty. Such was the nature of legal sovereignty under the Constitution. Real or political sovereignty rested, of course, not with the Federal or State governments, but with the ‘‘people.’’