Controversial Books | Page 34

12 The Constitution’s Deep Roots Federalist is universally acknowledged as an American classic, as an indispensable source for an understanding and appreciation of the original meaning and purpose of almost every provision of the Constitution. To his lasting fame and credit, it was Alexander Hamilton who organized the collective effort to publish The Federalist and wrote most of the essays. Speaking for most of the delegates who attended the Philadelphia Convention, and certainly for many of his countrymen as well, Hamilton confronted the basic dilemma Americans faced in 1787. The Articles of Confederation, he wrote in Federalist No. 15, were an invitation to disaster. ‘‘We may indeed with propriety be said to have reached almost the last stage of national humiliation,’’ wrote Hamilton. Something must be done, he said, ‘‘to rescue us from impending anarchy.’’ The nation was steeped in debt to foreigners and its own citizens; valuable American territories were still in the possession of Great Britain; there were no troops or funds to repel invaders; access to the Mississippi River was impeded by Spain; commerce had declined to its lowest point. So great was ‘‘the imbecility of our government,’’ he complained, that foreign governments would not even deal with it. ‘‘The evils we experience,’’ Hamilton concluded, ‘‘do not proceed from minute or partial imperfections, but from fundamental errors in the structure of the building, which cannot be amended otherwise than by an alteration in the first principles and main pillars of the fabric.’’ It was on this basis that the Framers proceeded to construct a new framework of government, casting aside the Articles of Confederation and building a new edifice, from the ground up, on ‘‘first principles.’’ But they did not have to begin from scratch. Before we explore the meaning and substance of those ‘‘first principles,’’ and seek to discover how and why they were incorporated into the Constitution, it is essential that we first examine their origin and historical development. ‘‘Not to know what happened before one was born,’’ as we were reminded long ago by Cicero, the great Roman statesman, ‘‘is always to be a child.’’ American political leaders were hardly ignorant or contemptuous of the past. The Framers respected the wisdom of their ancestors, especially their religious learning. They had been reared on the King James version of the Bible, and at least half of them—being Episcopalians—were well acquainted with the Book of Common Prayer. They also respected the les-