Controversial Books | Page 476

Appendix 473 British officers; Jews in America control "the press, the government, the motion pictures." On September 3, 1950, Bandek spoke at the First Congregational Church in Los Angeles, of which the Reverend William F. Fifield—founder of Spiritual Mobilization, and a friend of Merwin K. Hart—is minister. Reverend Young, who was present, heard Bandek say that "the decision to partition Palestine was the result of the support to the Zionists by the Soviet Union and by American leaders . . . seeking not the interest of Christ, but votes." Reverend Young reported: "Gerald K. Smith sat in front of me and applauded practically everything Mr. Bandak said. ... I heard no discussion of ways and means to help the unfortunate Christians in Bethlehem, the avowed purpose of Bandak's organization. There was, however, a great deal said about the Jew." Among Bandek's friends were Arab-born journalists who, like himself, carried on as pro-Arab propagandists. One of these was Levon Keshishian, an Armenian whom I met in Jerusalem in April, 1948, and who wrote a note of introduction to Emil Ghoury, a leading henchman of the Grand Mufti, recommending me as "a friend journalist; he is OK." Keshishian was imprisoned for the duration of the Arab-Israel war in a jail in Amman, Jordan. When I met him again in this country—where he is now serving as UN correspondent for the Arab News Agency—Keshishian told me that the charges had included espionage, but that he had later been released without trial. On his person had been found various letters and checks from Jews, Armenians, and others. Amman officials had refused to accept his explanation of these, Keshishian said. "They almost hanged me," he complained. This man also writes regularly for Hairenik Weekly, the Boston publication of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, filling its columns with pro-Arab stories. He has also addressed meetings of this organization. Tragic indeed must be the state of those Americans who in their legitimate concern for the welfare of Arab refugees allow themselves to be duped by appeals of distortion, falsehood, and bigotry inspired by Bandek, Freeman, Hart, and their like. There is a just case for the homeless Arabs. But neither these refugees nor efforts at a conciliatory settlement of their plight can be aided