Controversial Books | Page 461

Israel, and Going Home 457 terms the whole of Israel impressed me as a testament to a living God—a living witness to His prophecy, a thing far more of the spirit than of the flesh. The spirit was infectious, especially to one who like myself had seen the material side: the Arab side. I viewed my tour of Israel in the light of a religious experience. I left Israel believing in miracles—that God still speaks, that prayers are answered, that the laws of Good and Evil still rule. By the same token I believe that Israel, after many tribulations, will survive. In the simplest of terms, Israel, as I saw it, represented Good: the Arab world—with the cruelty perpetrated upon its vast masses, and with the immorality and transgression of its ruling classes—represented Evil. Between the two I had no doubt how the struggle would resolve itself. I believe, with the faith of a child, in the ultimate triumph of democracy not in Israel alone, but throughout the world. Israel proved, too, a sentimental homeland for me. For two thousand years the Jews had dreamed of independence; for a thousand years the Armenians have dreamed of a sovereign, democratic homeland, to which one might come and go freely. I had gained entry into almost every country, but where I yearned to go most, I was not permitted. No visitor has entered Soviet Armenia since 1947. Few have ever left it I thrilled vicariously at the good fortune of Israel. Had not the Armenians suffered under the Turks, though to a lesser degree, as the Jews under Hitler? How similar the tortured background of these two ancient peoples, how common their yearning for liberty. Had not Franz Werfel, an Austrian Jew, finding kinship with the suffering Armenians, also found inspiration in the struggle of the Armenians of Musa Dagh for survival? How natural, then, for one of Armenian birth to find inspiration in Israel! As I moved and dreamed from one end of Israel to the other, in my mind's eye I found myself substituting Arme-