CONTEMPORARY EURASIA VIII (2) ContEurVIII2 | Page 14

CONTEMPORARY EURASIA VIII (2) batch of Chinese BITs (most of the BITs signed before 1995) follow the practice adopted in the first Chinese Model BIT 39 and do not contain an NT clause. Statistically, less than half of all Chinese treaties contain an NT clause. The Armenia – China BIT follows the earlier Chinese BIT practice and does not contain an NT clause. 40 The absence of an NT clause allows both of the contracting parties to maintain full discretion upon providing a differential level of treatment and protection to domestic and foreign. 41 Thus, it does not guarantee that foreign investors will not be discriminated against compared to domestic companies. Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment Clause The Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) clause ensures a level playing field and the equality of competitive conditions among foreign investors that seek to make investments in a host state, by eliminating discrimination based on national considerations. 42 MFN clauses ensure that the host state provides not less favorable treatment to investors originating from a foreign country than is provided to any other third state in the agreed space of relation covered by the treaty. 43 MFN is a relative standard, meaning that the scope of the clause is based on the host state’s conduct towards third state investors. 44 Thus, as soon as the state provides more favorable treatment to a third state, it is automatically extended to all the other states that it has a treaty with. Consequently, if the state does not provide better treatment to any third state, the MFN clause does not have any practical importance. The BITs signed between China and Armenia contains an MFN clause. However, it has limitations that can significantly restrict the scope of MFN clauses. First of all, the Armenia-China BIT adopts a post- establishment MFN clause, which applies only to investments that have                                                                                                                                        treatment for foreign investment in China: A changing landscape," ICSID review 27, no. 1 (2012): 120-144, etc. 39 First Model BIT has been adopted by MOFCOM in the early 1980s. 40 Armenia – China BIT (1992). 41 Lei Cai, "Where does China Stand: the Evolving National Treatment Standard in BITs?" The Journal of World Investment & Trade 13, no. 3 (2012): 374. 42 UNCTAD, Most-Favored-Nation Treatment (UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, New York and Geneva, 2010, 30). 43 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. International investment law: a changing landscape; a companion volume to international investment perspectives. OECD, 2005: 128. 44 Rudolf Dolzer and Christoph Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2012, 206). 14