Consumer Bankruptcy Journal Spring 2016 | Page 50

PROPERTY TAX CERTIFICATE CLAIMS Rediscover the lost art of human interaction. Solo and small firm clients don’t want to talk to a machine. Which is why firms like yours rely on Ruby, the highly trained team of offsite receptionists who handle all your calls with the perfect mix of friendliness and professionalism. With Ruby, you’ll stand out from the competition by providing an exceptional customer experience delivered by a real, caring person. 866-611-RUBY (7829) or visit callruby.com/nacba of $14,500.00 in a 60 month plan. Below the interest bearing portion of the claim, on a separate line, we would include a prepetition interest, attorney’s fees and costs section where no interest is paid out over the plan. As you can see, this ends up saving the debtor a significant amount of money. The tax certificate holders may argue that if paid less than the amount allowed under state law, they may not be required to release the liens upon discharge. The Court in In re Slade-Lanier, admonished the certificate holders in response to such an argument stating that Creditor’s may not take actions that violate the terms of a confirmed plan. The Court stated that the code allows debtors to modify the rights of holders of allowed secured claims. In re Slade-Lanier, 2014 WL 2565919 (Bankr. N.D.OH 2014). (Citing In re Lane, 280 F.3d 663 (6th Cir. 2002); cf In re City of Detroit Mich., 504 B.R. 97, 150 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2013)(stating that the bankruptcy Code permitted the impairment of creditors’ state law rights to payment even when the Michigan Constitution provided that the rights were not subject to impairment). This reasoning was affirmed in Saddler where the court again stated that Creditors may not take actions that violate the terms of a confirmed plan. SCS Credit Corp., 541 U.S. 465 (2004) rate of interest. As an example, See, In re Cortner, 400 B.R. 608 (Bankr. S.D.OH, 2009). So what is next on the tax certificate front besides lots of objections to existing tax certificate claims? Perhaps a novel argument to extend Till can be made? The most sure fire way to make 18% tax certificates a thing of the past though, is to get the bar involved in attempting to get the Ohio Revised Code and similar other state code provisions amended. Eighteen percent interest is simply too onerous for people who were having a hard time paying their property taxes in the first place. Property tax certificates are simply not solving the issue that they were supposed to resolve; the restoration of lost revenue to the County, and a lessening of the “zombie apocalypse.” Unfortunately for us in Ohio, it looks like we are stuck at the certificate rate of interest. we have seen several cases which argued for and lost on the Till v. 50 CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY JOURNAL Spring 2016 National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys