Confero Fall 2013: Issue 4 | Page 18

Feature THE BIGGEST MYTH FOR INVESTMENT CONSULTANTS & FIDUCIARIES By Gabriel Potter, AIF® We apologize for the bad news ... Many of our readers are fiduciary trustees for large pools of money: pension funds, charitable foundations, employee welfare & retirement plans, and so on. You, the fiduciaries, should be applauded for adopting this burden, for it is often an underappreciated duty. As fiduciaries, you are responsible for a great deal and the scope of your responsibilities is ever increasing. At Westminster Consulting, we sometimes are bearers of bad news. It would be easier to tell investment committees all the ways that their attention wasn’t required and how much more leisure time everyone gets. In reality, we are obligated to explain where your fiduciary duties are. Here’s where the bad news come in. We have spoken with trustees working for a retirement plan or charity that have, in an effort to off-load fiduciary 16 | FALL SUMMER 2013 2013 responsibility, hired a fiduciary consultant to help manage their plan. Herein lays the Myth… some consultants may claim to act as a fiduciary but still have major conflicts of interest. THE MYTH: “Our trustees hired an investment consultant with fiduciary status. Our consultant has no conflict of interest because he is a fiduciary! So, our plan is totally covered and we, the trustees, we are no longer responsible for the plan.” THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF FAILURE THE FACTS: This is wrong in two important ways. First, once you hire a consultant, even one that adopts a fiduciary standard, plan fiduciaries cannot completely off-load their fiduciary responsibility. They may share responsibility with a consultant, but they cannot off-load it completely. Second, and most importantly, the plan fiduciaries will always be responsible for overseeing the consultant. Why is this difficult? The sad reality is that As a reminder, what’s the difference between a broker and a fiduciary? In summary, brokers are salesmen while fiduciaries are legally obliged to act in your interests alone, without conflict of interest or undivided loyalty. Let’s consider about the investment landscape for a moment. For decades, investment consultants and brokers working for wirehouses and large brokerage firms were subject to a lesser standard – the suitability standard – but now the fiduciary standard is expanding to become the new legal benchmark of behavior. The salesman can compete by expanding their business to include fiduciary lines of business, but it is not clear when they are acting in their own