Commercial Investment Real Estate July/August 2016 | Page 25
becomes even more important. Are the replacement securi-
ties optimized for the borrower? Are the transaction costs
fair? Is the borrower the beneficiary of the value of the
successor borrower?
Borrowers should think about this. Most loans have a 30- to
180-day open prepayment window, but most older loan doc-
uments require the borrower to buy replacement securities
through loan maturity. If the successor borrower later repays
the loan at the beginning of the open prepayment window,
it will reap a windfall. Will the borrower participate in that
windfall when it happens or be off ered a present value share
of that value at the time of defeasance?
Simply put, understand that two variables — the reduction
of the remaining loan term and increased replacement securi-
ties yields — decrease the cost of defeasance. One of the fun-
damental benefi ts of defeasance is the fl exibility to refi nance
the property at current low rates. Like yield maintenance, the
present value of remaining interest payments generally repre-
sents the largest component of defeasance cost.
Th e most obvious risks in deferring a refi nance until the
open period are the possibility of a higher interest rate and
the maturity risk from refi nancing in less liquid future capital
markets. Th erefore, if a qualifi ed intermediary has modeled
the loan defeasance, the borrower can monitor rates, capital
market conditions, and defeasance costs in real time to better
react at an optimal point in time.
For many borrowers, that optimal point in time comes 12
to 18 months prior to loan maturity. Still others employ alter-
native strategies, such as a forward loan rate lock to reduce or
eliminate prepayment costs, or a sale with assumption of the
debt as a way to avoid defeasance. Also, the prepaid interest
component of defeasance may be tax deductible, something
borrowers should discuss with their tax professional as a part
of an overall portfolio strategy. Ultimately, deferring a refi -
nance in a rising rate environment means borrowers this year
could lose out by waiting until 2017 or 2018 to refi nance.
Reducing Defeasance Costs
When fi nancing a property with CMBS debt, borrowers
should attempt to negotiate several favorable defeasance pro-
visions. For example, they should defi ne defeasance collat-
eral to include not only U.S. Treasuries but also other agency
securities that may have a higher yield. Th ey should seek the
right to designate the successor borrower. If possible, they
should secure the right to loan defeasance only through the
start of an open period as opposed to through maturity. Also
they should ask for the rights to deliver securities instead of
cash to the lender for their purchase, cap servicer defeasance
fees, and choose between defeasance and yield maintenance.
Defeasance can be a powerful tool in today’s low interest
rate market. While the defeasance cost will decrease over
time to zero, rising interest rates will make new debt more
expensive and reduce cash fl ow aft er debt service. Using an
CCIM.com
experienced mortgage broker who works with a qualifi ed
defeasance intermediary can help to take advantage of the
available refi nance opportunities.
Does Defeasance Make Sense?
Th e decision to use defeasance to refi nance depends on sev-
eral factors, but the fi nancial analysis aspect is relatively
straightforward. For example, in 2007, Colliers originated a
$12 million loan with a term of 10 years, an amortization of
30 years, and an interest rate of 5.75 percent. Th e annual debt
service was approximately $840,000, with a remaining loan
balance of approximately $10,350,000 at the time of refi nanc-
ing, 8.5 years into the loan term. Defeasance and refi nancing
transactions costs totaled slightly more than $950,000.
Colliers obtained competitive bids for a new loan sized to 100
percent of refi nancing costs, and recommended a nonrecourse
option with a 10-year fi xed rate of 4.50 percent, amortized
over 30 years and new annual debt service of approximately
$690,000. Th is resulted in an increase in pre-tax net cash fl ow
of $150,000 to the borrower. Additionally, the client’s tax pro-
fessional advised that a signifi cant portion of the defeasance
costs and transactions fees would provide valuable tax benefi ts
to the client. Between the reduction in debt service and the value
of tax deductions, the time to recoup cost was relatively short.
Moreover, given that the borrower could refi nance to a lower
rate with no cash out of pocket and eliminate both refi nance
risk in 18 months and interest rate risk for 10 years, defeasance
and refi nancing made sense.
Sometimes defeasance is not feasible. A loan may be locked
out from prepayment, deals with longer remaining terms may
be simply too expensive to refi nance.
On the other hand, borrowers oft en choose to defer defea-
sance for loans with less than 12 months remaining until the
open period or maturity. In this scenario, Colliers has used
forward rate commitments with insurance companies and
banks to rate lock for up to 12 months in advance of refi -
nancing to signifi cantly reduce defeasance costs or eliminate
them altogether.
In summary, borrowers who have loans with defeasance
provisions should have a qualifi ed party model defeasance
based on the specifi c loan document provisions now. Even if
it is not feasible to use loan defeasance now, borrowers should
request periodic real-time updates of the defeasance cost. If
borrowers are 12 to 24 months from maturity or open pre-
payment period, they are likely close to the sweet spot for
refi nancing to a lower rate. Such preparation now will better
position borrowers to move quickly when they determine the
time is right.
Thomas Welch is senior vice president and John Poole is an
associate of the capital markets team at Colliers International in
Boston. Contact them at [email protected] and John.
[email protected].
July | August | 2016