Cold Link Africa September 2020 | Page 7

INCORPORATING COLD CHAIN NEWS Energy test case study proves long-term savings Staycold International was recently challenged to demonstrate the energy efficiency of their cabinets by a local quick service restaurant (QSR) chain, who had a requirement to reduce the energy consumption in their stores. The QSR had the following refrigeration units to work with: • 2 x Double sliding door beverage coolers from a competitor (similar to their SD890 units) • 1 x 1.8m Underbar with pizza top (similar to their SHDU1800-PHC) THE TEST It was decided that Staycold would supply 1 x SD890-HC beverage cooler, the latest of their range of 890 sliding door units with hydrocarbon refrigerant gas. This unit would be run side by side with one of the current units in the store, so that a real time comparison could be made between the two. Staycold also supplied one of their new Underbar units, the SHDU1800-PHC that would also be used as a comparison to the current 1.8m pizza top unit already in the outlet. Both the units supplied by Staycold SD890-HC and SHDU1800-PHC are their most efficient variants of each model, utilising hydrocarbon refrigerants (zero ODP and low GWP) and have high efficiency, EC fan motors on both the evaporator and condenser. Although this level of specification has an impact on the purchase price of the units compared to the current models the outlet is using, Staycold were confident that a case could be made regarding the total cost of ownership once electricity costs is bought into play. The units are also equipped with an energy saving digital controller (EMD) which can be programmed to further reduce energy consumption automatically dependant on unit use. It was decided by Staycold, that this functionality would be disabled so that a like-for-like comparison could be made in the test – in other words, the use of the unit and their conditions would be as close and equal as possible. RESULTS The test was conducted in July 2020, and the energy consumption was metered over a few days. The information below indicates results for the beverage coolers: Staycold SD890-HC purchase price R 14 500.00 Competitor purchase price R 11 730.00 Customers and consumers should be urged to consider not only the CAPEX outlay of a unit, but also the OPEX costs Table 1: Beverage cooler results Considering an average kWh cost of R2.00, it can be seen that the Staycold model would reduce energy costs by 33% compared to the competitor model If we extrapolate that over time, we get the following TCO comparison between running two Staycold units compared to two x competitor units: Table 2: TCO comparison (cumulative cost) [not bold and not sub-head] If the Staycold unit was able to utilise its energy saving controller then the energy costs would reduce by about 25% further due to the ECO mode function The graph below incorporates this, and it can be seen that the ROI is between 1.5 to 2 years and by the end of the 7th year, companies have saved enough to buy another cooler. The information below is the results from the underbar comparison: Staycold SHDU1800-PHC purchase price: R21 250.00 Competitor purchase price: R25 422.00 Considering an average kWh cost of R2.00, it can be seen that the Staycold model would reduce energy costs by 57% compared to the competitor model, and if we extrapolate that over time, we get the following TCO comparison: Table 3: Underbar comparison From the above figures it can be seen that there is an argument for choosing a more energy efficient product, with a 7-year saving almost equating to the cost of a new unit. Table 4: Purchase and Electricity cost over seven year period Staycold Part of the testing also included a new underbar unit. By choosing Staycold, companies can ensure that they not only get a great quality, reliable and durable product, but also a product that over time will reduce their energy costs. CONCLUSION In light of all the information above, customers and consumers should be urged to consider not only the CAPEX outlay of a unit, but also the OPEX costs, as the impact of an inefficient unit on their business’ bottom line is quite real in reduce their energy costs by a significant amount and is also better for the environment as a whole. CLA COLD LINK AFRICA • September 2020 www.coldlinkafrica.co.za 7