Outrageous claims on Tech Influence Lobby 20
• cont-->>MEDIA STRUCTURE: "commi%ee to combat pseudoscience":
Use of highly exclusive selec0vity of scien0fic data unseen even in most regular
western mainstream scien0fic commi9ees and o:en declare targeted certain tech
not presen0ng "a single evidence of it can work”, hence fraud: its recent selec0vity
level is close to western Quackwatch, CSICOP, “famous” 1millon$ challenge, Cold
Fusion debunker physicist group: even more selec0ve than Western mainstream
media level.
• Small # of opponents call it “pseudoscien0fic commission”, disgrace to RAS etc(BF
Шарков, РГ Кузнецов, АА Рухадзе +). But strangely 80%+ of mainstream Russian
media automa0cally comply to its statement with no cri0cism or inves0ga0ve
valida0on, and bulk of RAS member scien0sts who are aware of this mostly stay
quiet. Only a handful of even pro-Russia main media ques7on them(Взгляд,
СводнаяПресса, Аргументы и Факты+).
• Either way its #1 purpose seems to be blocking progress of non std science in
Russia(ММ Лаврентьев +), to keep it as same level as west’s public consump0on
science?, and they might benefit by monopolizing funding on western mainstream
approved science only etc(VA Zhigalov, Shipov, МВ Виноградов +), but their
difference in role compared to Western peers is not to sever mainstream groups
connec7on to “pseudoscience tech”, but to cri0cize government, senior poli0cian,
military or major corpora0on for already using/promo0ng such technologies by
literally ignoring all effec0veness evidence: examples(con0nue to next page): 426