Outrageous claims on Tech Influence Lobby 18
• cont-->>MEDIA STRUCTURE:
A- Largely uniform in mainstream US, UK, Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan, All of
Nordics, Most of W Euro: ie Western NGO ranked “least corrupt naEons"(eg Since
pseudoscien;zed techs don’t count, none of BRICS na;ons' unique effec;ve tech would
make them rank to top 20 innova;ve na;ons category by those NGOs). Wikipedia in
ALL languages, large NGOs, Quack Watch etc, a few sci media (Wired, Phys.org+)
might report “edge science” posiEvely, Rare & but increasingly frequent gap bet.
Academia vs Media, or Media/Govn’t reporEng of North America vs W Europe(eg:
Euronews: science info encouraging decentralized efficient energy system benefits, or
emphasizing negaEvity test of GMO or Sodium Fluoride water etc ).
• B- Type science news is occasionally carried in:
SOME media/Gov’t ar5cles in: certain W & South Euro naEons(Austria, Ireland, Italy,
France, Portugal, Greece+), Some of E Euro, 20-30% of 3rd World naEons, AlternaEve
news in West (Gizmo, Gizmag, WHDT+), Prv media ocen proWest science treatment,
but not state(Venezuela, Brazil, S Africa, Ecuador+), Industry specific & military journal
in West
MAJORITY of media/Gov’t ar5cles: of Middle East even including western ally Saudi,
70-80% of 3rd world(Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines+), some E. Euro(Serbia, Hungary,
Slovenia, Romania, Moldova, Ukraine+), *Russia, China, India, Others(S Korea, Turkey,
Kazakhstan, Iran, Cuba+), Non Western NGOs, Most of 3rd world military journals:
science/ media’s weaker Ees to mulEnaEonal group compared to own naEonalist
interests?: -->> cont:
424