Disclosure Impact - Review of Dubious Claims? 12:
Denial of Catastrophic Global Warming By Manmade CO2
• ->>cont 10 Crisis Idea: eg2■ Man's CO2 only catastrophic warming idea ignores:
• p-Other man/noman made element might have far more impact, etc : Hence this
phenomena is not even Western science consensus, only main media/gov’t(except
US since 2017 in west, but many non western naDons actually passively not agreeing)
/NGO/IPCC consensus(Lafrembois, Bo Carter, Moncton, J Lovelock, JL Ward+), which is
opposite of media claims(science consensus but s?ll media level debate exists):
• i-IPCC founding charter itself says "Purpose is to show human is changing
climate"(Maurice Strong), ii-Many scienDsts are forced into or tricked into
signing(K-E Puls, Iv Giaever, Jud Curry+), iii-”Mistakenly" counted as supporDng
IPCC(Wil Soon, Al Carlin+), iv-Needs lawsuit to remove name from support(P
Reiter+), v-Hurts career to disagree with media/NGO's view regardless of actual
scien@fic consensus(Dav Bellamy, Phi Verdier+), vi-EducaDon content altered to
make sense of increasingly contradictory theory(Joh Ball+).
• From pure data tracking/academic only point of view as of 2016 from 1990s when
"crisis predicDon" science-policy was formulated is sDll being adhered as correct can be
safely stated either some kind of large well coordinated corrupDon, hoax, fraud, or
beyond normal collecDve incom petency(Wil Happer, Dav Evans+), i.e. ignore data
altering to keep funding/job security/public reputaDon etc is much more "pracDcal way
to do science" than sDcking to pure science,
398