Bio
29: Measuring BioEnergetic Field Effect
• ->>cont: BioEnerge.c field: ■β: Field affec.ng: vi-Non contact Healing:
• Because of alleged significant performance gap by prac66oner(this factor is
conveniently ignored by mainstream & some6mes used to debunk en6re healers
claims), large control sample research of high performer for serious chronic
disease is very difficult with current funding/profit structure(some excep6on in
China), while mainstream will call such test "Immoral"(they declare nonlocality
cannot have any physical effect etc), & can easily obfuscate experiments by
pressuring to set condi6ons that are design to have weaker effect(specula6ng from
other medical tampering & numerous consistent examples of disrup6ve energy tech
experiment tampering by mainstream or its suppor6ng & parasi6c groups).
• This issue can be equated to exaggerated example of marathon running in which not
all runners(e.g. equa6ng as healer) necessarily runs marathon under 2h20mins
(e.g. equivalent of meaning as strong healing effect), and some run at 3hrs(eg barely
marginal effect), and large majority runs marathon at 3.5hrs and more (eg zero
effect or worse). So if randomly select 10 marathon runners(eg healers) to test "in
order to get fair controlled results" as average, there might be no effect at all, or one
or two strong effect would become "sta6s6cal error" - hence s6ll no effect at all.
Furthermore, gathering of high performance healers itself would become "selec6ve
data" and becomes void as qualified research by "trusted scien6fic protocol".
-->>cont:
270
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada