“ Pseudo Science” Free Energy HHO, OxyHydrogen Gas 2: Booster Comparison
•-- >> cont: example of on-board HHO energy saving device compe: tors:
• Same level low cost FarInfraRed( FIR) wave emi7ng nano ceramic in oil addi9ve( Ceramic Power Liquid +), or FIR solid state device placed in gas
tank( Moletech biz +), micro EM field / FIR wave of certain " form " by layers of different electrical poten9al minerals to augment combus9on( Nanotech-beam SatoCompany +), Vortex intake air flow based fuel saver with 5million + units sold claims( Hiclone qld): above non HHO devices seem to be minor 5-15 % range cost reduc9on at best, but some evidence of further saving when combined. More minor 3-5 % level saving Plasma induced improved aerodynamics( Plasma Stream),.
• Yet even 10 %+ saving fuel addi9ve is s9ll wholly pseudoscien9zed or ignored by " trusted " Western Mainstream media / NGO / Gov ' t for consumer market( many non-west Govn ' t approved) while increasingly used by industrial opera9ons( Mazoil Maz Nitro +), and previously listed " add on " devices in last 2pages are quietly installed for building / HVAC / ligh9ng and industrial opera9onal applica9ons by some mainstream ESCO( Energy Service Company) and Energy Performance engineering companies that guarantee energy saving under Energy Performance Contract.-- >> cont:
linkedin. com / in / newnatureparadigm-Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada
155