Coaching Matters Volume 3 Issue 6 | Page 11

T he ‘traditional’ coaching method is based on repetitive drills relating to technical skills of the game, with very little practice of the game itself. This is not the best way young people learn and makes sport less fun. Players of all ages should be encouraged to play the game, or modified versions suited to their level of development, to learn the necessary game sense. The ‘traditional’ approach The ‘old school’ session format (Warm up > Teaching a skill > Repeated practice > Game) has a number of drawbacks. The coach normally tells the players what to do, rather than players being given situations where they must discover the best methods of success for themselves. There is an over-emphasis on practising technique at the expense of teaching and practising decision-making skills. Many of the drills don’t require players to think and often have little relevance to the actual game. Players get bored. Mindless drills take the skill out of the context of the game. Is tackling a tackle bag the same as tackling a nimble half-back? Is running unopposed, predetermined sets the same as playing against a well-organised and reactive defence? Tactical skills The difference between a good tactical player and a player who has tactical knowledge is that the former is able to execute the appropriate tactics correctly in a game, whereas the latter may have the appropriate knowledge but is unable to apply it. Some players are often accused of being unable to perform under pressure due to mental weakness, when the real reason 11 may be that they’ve not been exposed to the decision-making and tactical skills within their programme. A player who possesses good tactics knows where to go and how to use space and time intelligently, both alone and with teammates. This ability to make tactical decisions