--classstrugggle-flipmag CS Oct-2018 MKP | Page 10

property neither more nor less than the peasants, in accordance with the Basic program on Chinese Agrarian Law. They should be made to work, and reformed. This is because landlords, after partici- pating in labour, are no small productive force. This is also because if we do not distribute necessary land and property to them, they will rob, steal and beg, bringing about social insecurity and the peasants will thus suffer. Even criminal elements, whose crimes are not of a degree deserving to be given the death penalty by the courts, must also, be given the necessary share of land and property. Only thus can there be social security. If the landlord has industry and commerce sufficient to support his livelihood, land of course need not be distributed. If his industry and commerce is too small to support his livelihood, it is necessary to distribute a portion of land to him. Rich Peasants – New Type There should also be a differentiation between dealing with new – type and old-type rich peasants. Some poor farming people in the past have through labour and production in the democratic regime rose to become new-type rich peasants, in this period of equal distribution of the land, they should be treated as well-to-do middle peasants. During equal land distriburtion their land in excess of the level of middle peasants in general can only be drawn upon with their agreement. If they themselves do not agree, their land should not be drawn upon. In the past, we encouraged this kind of rich peasant people like Wu Wan-yu (well- known labour hero of the Yenan Border Region— Editor). For instance, develop their production. This played a great role in stabilizing the middle peasants and stimulating their production enthusiasm. Policy on Industry and Commerce Industry and commerce in general should be protected. Not even industry and commerce operated by landlords and rich peasants should be confiscated. It should likewise receive the protection of the democratic government. The party’s policy is only to confiscate the industry and commerce of bureaucratic capital and really big despotic counter-revolutionary elements, and place them under the ownership of the state or the people. Furthermore, it is definitely laid down that of this industry and commerce to be confiscated, that which is needed by the national economy must be enabled to continue and not cease operations; and still less should it be damaged or be arbitrarily dispersed. But what about landlords who during the period of reduction of rents and interests sold their land and invested in industry commerce— can confiscation be carried out against them? Both in the past and in the present, we protect and encourage this sort of industry and commerce because this is beneficial and necessary for the prospering of China’s economy. In acquiring the landlord’s hidden wealth, it 10 must be stipulated that the landlord is not permitted to destroy his industry, on pain of punishment. Partial and temporary interest must be subordi- nated to the over-all, long-term interest. For example, if the landlord operates coal pits, the peasants may, from the point of view of their present partial interest, show their hands in support of confiscating and distributing them, because if everyone is distributed a portion of the tools and materials from the coal pits, it may temporarily solve their own problems. Under these circumstances, we must persuade the peasants to understand the advantages of having the coal pits in existence intact. And that if dispersed, the coal pits will be ruined and they themselves will have no coal to burn. This would hinder the economic development of the liberated areas. If we want to be independent, public-operated, private-operated and people’s co-operative handicraft industry, and rural agriculture must be enabled to develop, producing large quantities of necessary goods and grain for the people’s Liberation Army so that our trade with the outside can maintain equilibrium or even a favourable trade balance and not rely on goods from areas controlled by Chiang Kai-shek or America. At present, the government trading companies within the liberated areas do not yet have the strength to set up stores universally. Co-operatives have not developed universally, and are sometimes badly run. Therefore, the existence of private commerce is necessary. Merchants, of course, engage in exploitation: the commercial activity of merchants, in itself, does not produce any value but the question is not to destroy commerce, but to give leadership to commerce. While his sort of policy is beneficial to the people, it is also beneficial to legitimate merchants. We must collect taxes from industry and commerce, but we must fix proper tax rates and we must see to it that they are not too heavy. This sort of tax rate should be based on the principle of not affecting their operations and development. The Intelligentia and Enlightened Gentry The majority of professors, teachers, scientists, engineers, artists, etc, come from landlord, rich peasant or capitalist families. But the work they themselves do is a sort of mental labour, toward these mental labourers, the democratic regime should adopt policies of protection, and should as much as possible win them to serve the people’s Republic. Under the KMT rule, the overwhelming majority among them lead a life economically very difficult and politically very unfree. Among them, moreover, are not a few unemployed. As for their opportunity for scientific creations and inventions, this is extremely slight. The overwhelming majority, seeing all sorts of corruption and reaction of Chiang Kai-shek’s and Class Struggle