Civil Insight: A Technical Magazine Volume 3 | Page 63

Gautam A. et al.
x
Civil Insight (2019) 57-63
Since the FEM model predicted a higher value of design axial load, the axial load distribution
calculated using the Classical Method needs to be revised to predict the design axial load for pile
foundation design.
Further Recommendations
Further researches using continuum soil modeling, special connection elements to represent soil-structure
interaction, and nonlinear methods can be carried out to determine the load distribution in piles more
accurately.
References
Boussinesq, M.J. (1885). Application des potentials a l’etude de deterequilibreet du mouvements de
solids elastiques. Paris: Gaythier-Villars.
Bowles, J.E. (2001). Foundation Analysis and Design. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
IS 2911-1-2 (2010). Design and Construction of Pile Foundations – Code of Practice. New Delhi: Bureau
of Indian Standards.
Kattell, J., & Eriksson, M. (1998). Bridge Scour Evaluation: Screening, Analysis, & Countermeasures (Vol.
9877). USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Technology and Development Center.
Randolph, M.F. (1978). Theoretical study of the performance of piles (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/250739
Randolph, M.F., & Wroth, C. P. (1979). An Analysis of Vertical Deformation of Piles. Geotechnique, 29(4),
423-439.
SAP2000 (Version 18.0.0) [Computer software]. (2015). Computers and Structures, Inc. Available from
https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000
Ukritchon, B., Faustino, J., & Keawsawasvong, S. (2015). A numerical study of load distribution of pile
group foundation by 2D model. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology, 13(8), 669-688.
Vesic, A. (1961). Beam on Elastic Subgrade and Winkler Hypothesis. 5th International Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Paris.
63