Civil Insight: A Technical Magazine Volume 2 | Page 15

CIVIL INSIGHT 2018 TEACHERS’ SECTION 15 Where E m , E c , I c are modulus of masonry, concrete and moment of inertia of column respectively. d inf , t inf , h inf and h c are diagonal length of infi ll, thickness of infi ll, height of infi ll and height of column respectively; angle of strut with horizontal is ș and w is the strut width. Wall opening is considered using reduction factor recommended by (Al-Chaar, 2002) ‫ܣ‬ ௢ ‫ܣ‬ ௢ ܴ ௙ ൌ ͲǤ͸ሾ ሿ ଶ ൅ ͳǤ͸ ቈ ቉ ൅ ͳ ‫ܣ‬ ௣ ‫ܣ‬ ௣ (3) Where R f , A o and A p are reduction factor, open area and infi ll panel area respectively. Masonry infi ll mechanical properties are calculated as per (IS 1893:2000), 6th revision, that is the compressive strength of masonry prism can be given as ݂ ௠ ൌ ͲǤͶ͵͵݂ ௕ ଴Ǥ଺ସ ݂ ௠௢ ଴Ǥଷ଺ (4) where f b and f mo are compressive strength of brick and mortar in MPa. From (IS 1077-1992), compressive strength of common burnt clay brick with grade 35 is 35 MPa and as per (IS 1905-1987), minimum strength of mortar at 28 days with grade of H1 is 10 MPa. Equation (4) gives the masonry strength and modulus of masonry is then calculated as E m =550f m , that yields 5309.4 MPa. Model description In this study, magnitude of mass irregularity considered are 200% and 300% with respect to adjacent story. Each building model is considered to have 3 bays of 5m length in both X and Y directions and height of 3.5m in each story totalling 6 stories. Figure 1: ETAB plan and 3D model of 6-story building Figure 2: Elevations showing location of mass irregularity with magnitude of 2M and 3M, where M is story mass of regular fl oor