Why this matters
There are existing examples within the rail network of strong integration between rail and other modes, but these are not consistent. To achieve the Government’ s aims, GBR will need a clear strategy for connection with rail operators who are not part of GBR and with other modes such as buses. It is important that this is strategically consistent across GBR, while allowing IRs the freedom to respond to local needs.
To truly achieve seamless end-toend journeys, GBR staff will need an understanding of these interactions with other modes and awareness of the regional transport network in the areas they serve. Again, there are areas of promise where this mindset is encouraged, but it needs to filter down across the entire network.
GBR’ s credibility will depend on whether passengers, freight customers and partner organisations experience it as one railway. If local delivery models create inconsistent priorities, branding or standards, this risks weakening the very simplicity and accountability GBR is intended to create.
CIRO’ s Perspective
CIRO supports locally empowered Integrated Railways, but they must operate within a clearly defined national framework. Local identity should support delivery, not dilute the GBR brand or weaken whole-network decision-making.
CIRO’ s Recommendation
GBR should define a national operating framework which makes clear how decisions are made across Integrated Railway boundaries, multi-operator corridors, freight flows and devolved interfaces. www. ciro. org
11