CHROMOHOMES CHM PDF Web | Page 22

OUTLOOK OUTLOOK FROM PLAYING BADMINTON, TO SKATING OR JOGGING, THERE ARE SO MANY REC- REATIONAL ACTIVI- TIES THAT YOU WILL FEEL SPOILT OF CHOICES AVAILABLE AT THE CENTRAL PARK RESORTS. FROM PLAYING BADMINTON, CYCLING, TO SKATING OR JOGGING, THERE ARE SO MANY RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES THAT YOU WILL FEEL SPOILT OF 40 CHROMOHOMES Š OCTOBER 2017 According to Venket Rao, RERA expert & chief executive, Intygrat Business Advi- sory, the legislative intent behind making RERA happen has been to bring in a large number of stuck projects in the ambit of the reform. “If one tracks the course of RERA there has been much activism from the customers in regard to this law. Sometime, during the course, RERA was contemplated to be introduced for new projects, however, ongoing projects were introduced with the primary aim to protect the interest of buyers even in the current stuck projects,” informs Rao. His study further reveals that almost all states have excluded projects which have obtained ‘occupancy certificate’ apart from those which have completion certificate from the definition of ongoing projects. Most of the states have even excluded project which have part completion or part occupancy or even applied for cases, from being an ongoing project. “States such as Uttar Pradesh has set forth cer- tain exemptions to the applicability of the law to ongoing projects, some of which are legally questionable, such as the use of a ‘partial completion certificate’ issued under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Apartment Ownership Act, 2013. This is ‘dilution’ of the spirit of the law, some- thing that other states are also trying to do to protect the interests of developers,” further adds Sandhir. Furthermore, in perspective of Jaxay Shah, president, CREDAI National, on- going projects coming under the ambit of RERA are more likely to get further delayed which will cause despair amongst the homebuyers who have already paid for their dream homes. “A constructive and concrete definition of ongoing projects accounting the stakes should be re-evaluated by states,” puts forward Shah, adding “the authorities which are responsible for seamlessly conducting the process and giving ap- proval should also be contained within RERA to ensure unbiasedness and transparency which is the prime objec- tive of RERA.” The developers were supposed to get a clear 90-day window for registrations commencing May 1, 2017 and ending July 31, 2017. Unfortunately, the state govern- ments were not ready with the registra- tion machinery on May 1, 2017. “Haryana notified the rules for the act only on July 28, leaving developers with only three days to register. UP asked developers to register online but could operationalise the website on July 26. Thankfully, UP has now given a 15-day extension without any penalty. Many states like Haryana and Punjab are not releasing the final regis- tration certificates yet because perhaps they want to vet the individual applica- tions,” informs Pankaj Bajaj, president, CREDAI NCR. It’s also been noticed that there is absolutely no scope for correction once a developer fills his registration and hence, most of the developers waited till the end moment to ensure that all the specifics are met as per RERA. Also RERA’s restric- tion on sale of any project without regis- tration will adversely aff ect the business cycle and can cripple the entire industry which is concerning. RERA is also not clear on how it plans to regulate real estate agents. “While the Act asks real estate agents to register with the state real estate authority after paying a certain fee, it does not really regulate the agents. It does not bring professional standards into the real estate brokerage industry,” further points out Sandhir. To make the Act successful, industry stakeholders think that all states should maintain uniformity in implementation of the rules that will bring in much needed transparency and pave the way for imple- mentation of standard practices across the sector. OCTOBER 2017 Š CHROMOHOMES 41