Chiiz Volume 06 : Wedding Photography | Page 24

Movie Review IMDB Rating: 7.7/10 Duration: 1 hour 51 Min Genre: Drama, Mystery, Thriller Released: 1966 Julio Cortazar, David Bailey and Swinging London. It’s difficult to assess which format of Blow Up created the greatest impact. Was it the 1959 Julio Cortazar short story originally titled, ‘Las babas del diablo’ (‘The Devil’s Drool) ? Or was it the 1966 Michelangelo Antonioni film of the same title ? I am of the opinion that it’s the latter, but before I state my case, let me take you through a snapshot of what Blow Up is about. The film takes the viewer through the wishwash of the high profile fashion photographer, Thomas Hemmings. He is constantly delayed due to his artistic perspective and it’s taking a toll on his daily schedule. During one of his artistics escapades in a public park, Thomas photographs a man and a woman deeply in love. At his photo studio he notices an oddity in the frame. And begins to blow up the image. He notices a gun. The story then revolves around how Thomas tries to piece together the murder that took place in the park. In a certain sense, Antonioni didn’t receive the kind of acknowledgement that a Bergman or a Kurosawa received, but I personally put him right up there with the two. Its simply because Antonioni, despite his lack of public rockstar status, was almost godfather to cinema aesthetes. Blow Up was a definite expression of what the counterculture London was in a really real sense. It takes us in the the artist’s world- the madness of drug induced parties, blatant sex and of the age old hierarchies of power and progress. Blow Up was shocking owing to its casualness with respect to its take on the aforementioned topics- thoughts that were both secret and sacred- not occupying a space of public consciousness. In Blow Up, there is also a scene featuring The Yardbirds- a band featuring Jeff Beck and Jimmy Page. The underground had never been better represented in its noise, excitement and rawness. Antonioni shows that a film in terms of its story needn’t necessarily be roped to its past, but there is always a room to appeal to the voraciousness of the present. Its a deeply influential film in the sense that language wasn’t a bar to pay homage to its legacy. Austin Powers, Blow Out and the Indian film, Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron paid 24 Vol 5 their homage to this film. The writers of Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron went as far as to replicate the park scene in Blow Up and name the park where the accident takes place Antonioni Park. There is a shocking originality in the Cortazar short story. It is in fact based on real life experiences of a London based photographer, David Bailey. It’s a pretty crazy story, but it actually happened ! Cortazar was told this story by a friend, Sergio Larraín, another photographer. The plot, the twist and the tale are ingenious works of literature. Antonioni is one of the rare filmmakers who could take a story and be conscious of an honest adaptation. Very often I feel that filmmakers, when they make a film based on a story created for literature, the end product is either underwhelming or overwhelming. Whether the experience is positive or negative is connotation for a different argument. However, Antonioni is a master of balancing the flavor of the story. His touch is inimitable and as a viewer, we are instantly transported into a version of London, steeped in the counterculture. The experience of Blow Up as a film is unmistakable. Right from the the lighting to the cinematography to the music, Blow Up tells us a picture, whether static or in motion, is a form of time-travel. Both Antonioni and Cortazar are master storytellers and the synergies of the written word and the moving picture makes Blow Up a must watch. Vignesh Swaminathan [email protected] Vignesh Swaminathan is a Product Designer by training. His interests include watching films, artificial Intelligence, football and reading non-fiction books. Vignesh supports Arsenal FC.