CESG Connections Magazine 2020 Issue | Page 14

intelligence around a national AI governance framework. The National Security Commission on AI’s Interim Report finds that “AI is not a panacea, but it will change the way we defend America; how we deter adversaries; how intelligence agencies make sense of the world; and how we fight.” How much and on what DoD invests in AI is likely a critical determinant of the future military balance among great power competitors. In an environment in which it is essential that every dollar be applied judiciously and there are resource tradeoffs associated with every decision, DoD components need the ability to picture cross-functional activities through a common lens and then track them across strategy, budgeting, and execution. Effective resource management through data science is essential to U.S. global competitiveness. Govini’s Artificial Intelligence Taxonomy is a key example of how data-driven insights enable efficient implementation of the NDS priorities and informs how investment, procurement, and acquisition activities can shift to better support the mission outcomes. 14 • CESGovernment.com The Artificial Intelligence Taxonomy consists of three categories (orange boxes) that broadly categorize Department of Defense investments in artificial intelligence. Beneath these are eight subcategories (white boxes) constituting specific capability areas. Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 through FY 2018 total expenditures and the corresponding five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) are noted for each subcategory. This hierarchical organizational structure shows high-level spending trends and granular details on individual efforts. DoD first noted the potential for AI to fundamentally change the character, if not nature, of warfare with the initiation of the Third Offset in 2014. The NDS reinforces this point. It underscores the necessity for DoD to invest in artificial intelligence to modernize its capabilities and maintain U.S. military advantage. To date, however, DoD’s investment trends in AI have not shown the dramatic change that might be expected to develop and incorporate this technology into military capability. Over the past five years, DoD experienced linear growth in its AI portfolio. It invested about $1.2 billion in core AI