CBP Initial Determination Malaysia Transshipping February 2022 | Page 22

are location stamped at a location which is not Sanctuary Stone ’ s location , which is also discussed above . 181

CBP obtained information from the CCM for the MSW Companies . 182 These five companies all share a web of employees , directors , shareholders , and addresses , and as they are operated by the same individuals at varying addresses , and all supply certain importers under investigation with QSP , CBP finds the MSW Companies act as a single entity . 183 CCM data indicates the dates of incorporation of these companies . When asked how long it has been opened for business , MSW indicated it has been in operation “ more than 10 years .” 184 This statement is false . Record information from CCM indicates MSW was incorporated December 20 , 2019 . 185 MSW also indicated its owner is Chong Wen How . 186 This is another false statement because the owner of MSW is Mr . Huang . 187

MSW submitted a document which indicates it purchased finished goods from Sanctuary Stone . 188 The invoice from MSW to Kingway is dated February 15 , 2021 . 189 However , MSW indicated it purchased QSP from Sanctuary Stone on March 19 , 2021 , over a month after the sale to Kingway . 190 As such , CBP finds this document is not responsive to the CF28 . Moreover , a nearly identical purchase document was submitted by MSI in Big D ’ s CF28 Response . 191 These purchase documents appear to have undergone some minor alterations to make them appear to be different ; however , there are many similarities . For example , the account number for MSW is identical to that of MSI , but the accounts have different names . 192 Moreover , the documents are time stamped to the identical thousandth of a second , “ 9:39:22 ,” and are both dated March 19 , 2021 . 193 In addition , the sender ’ s and receiver ’ s reference numbers are identical , as well as the monetary amounts and the message to the beneficiary . 194 There is nothing in MSW ’ s purchase document which ties it to the entry in question ( e . g ., invoice number , purchase order number , production records , etc .). In sum , CBP finds this document is not responsive to the CF28 and appears to have been created in response to CBP ’ s request for information , rather than a document kept by MSW in the normal course of business .

In the CF28 , CBP requested that Kingway provide entry transaction information including the original commercial invoices , proof of payments , CF7501s , contracts , purchase orders , country of origin documentation , and all bills of lading . CBP noted that the proof of payment should tie

181

See Malaysian Companies Memo at Sanctuary Stone for a map indicating the distance between these two locations . This is also discussed in the “ Big D ” section above .

182

See Malaysian Companies Memo at Companies Commission of Malaysia for a summary chart which indicates the various overlaps between these five companies and the reports we received for each company .

183

Id .

184

See Kingway ’ s CF28 Response .

185

See Malaysian Companies Memo at Companies Commission of Malaysia .

186

See Kingway ’ s CF28 Response .

187

See Malaysian Companies Memo at Companies Commission of Malaysia .

188

See Kingway ’ s CF28 Response .

189

Id .

190

Id .

191

See Big D ’ s CF28 Response .

192

See a comparison of Big D ’ s CF28 Response and Kingway ’ s CF28 Response .

193

Id .

194

Id .

22