CATALYST Issue 4 | Page 36

D Dexterity | Catalyst “It seems we’ve lost sight of the reciprocity that once underpinned social contracts, that the balance has tipped towards maximum economic flexibility for employers” Labour market shift ‘Contingent workforce’ is an umbrella term that covers a range of employment relationships. In essence, it’s a pool of labour available for hire on an on-demand basis, and includes part-time or temporary workers, freelancers, independent contractors and consultants. Contingent workers are not on a company’s payroll because they are not full-time, permanent employees. They may work onsite or remotely. And they are a core element of the global trend towards a more diverse – and fragmented – workforce. According to Deloitte’s 2019 Global Human Capital Trends survey, more than 40% of US workers now work on a contingent basis. In the EU, freelancers are the biggest labour group, with numbers doubling between 2000 and 2014. Deloitte’s latest millennial study also reports that 64% of respondents – already in full-time employment – are looking for ‘side hustles’ to make ends meet. And increasingly long-lived and healthy retirees are re-entering the workforce, often on a flexible basis. The survey also suggests that it’s not just governments that are alexandermannsolutions.com 36 struggling to keep up with this labour market shift. The majority of organisations seem ill-prepared for their new-style workforce, taking a ‘transactional’ rather than a ‘strategic’ approach, with inconsistent or non-existent processes for managing and developing contingent workers. Too often, they are deployed tactically to ‘fill gaps’ rather than being seen as a longer-term solution to providing crucial skills. One reason for the prevalence of this approach is that organisations have traditionally recruited contingent workers via a straightforward procurement process, hiring in people as they would any other outsourced resource. This might be efficient, and might have worked when contingent workers represented only a small percentage of the workforce, but with on-demand workers now playing a much more central role, best rates and best value are, in themselves, no longer enough. At the very least, companies are in danger of failing to make the most of the much-needed skills that contingent workers offer. At worst, a strict efficiency- led approach raises the spectre of exploitation. Mark Jones, senior vice president of Alexander Mann Solutions Americas, has watched the rise of on-demand labour for a number of years. “Even back in 2008, companies like Microsoft were anticipating a 50:50 split between their employed and contingent workforce, and, for some companies, that’s already happening,” he says. While companies have always used contract workers, the rapid rise of technology and digital platforms over the past decade has made it easier than ever for companies to leverage a growing contingent workforce, and for workers to offer their labour on a more flexible basis. Physical location has also become less of a barrier. For example, research by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations suggests that India is home to some 15 million freelance professionals, offering a range of skills and services across the globe. For Jones, if employers are to make the most of this new world, they need new engagement models and practices to become the company of choice for a contract-fluid workforce. The issue is not just one of leveraging flexible workers, but also engaging with them. Increasingly outdated and outmoded regulation, such as the US’s co-employment law, also needs to be carefully negotiated. “Companies need clear protocols around what they’re responsible for and what flexible workers – or their agents – will handle,” says Jones. “Forward-thinking organisations that take a creative and innovative approach to engagement with contingent workers will win important competitive advantage.”