CardioSource WorldNews | Page 12

THE BE T Multimedia Highlights From the CardioSource WorldNews YouTube Channel | Scan the QR code to watch the full video 3-Year Results of ORBIT II Patients with TAVR and a Left Main Stent: Room Enough for 2 Giants? TAVR: Good Results Confirmed for New-generation TAVR Devices Raj Makkar, MD: “One of the concerns early on was [the question], ‘Are we going to be able to access coronary arteries after we put in this metal cage, which is what TAVR is, with a valve inside it?’ Of course, today, I think dealing with coronary obstructions and going through these metal cages is almost a nonissue.” Alec Vahanian, MD: “[The LotusTM Valve] is one of the new devices. It has several particular advantages: it can be repositioned; it can be retrieved for more satisfactory positioning; and it also has a skirt, which is aiming at decreasing the paravalvular leaks. There plenty of theoretical—and, point of fact, real—advantages. What we didn’t know was the long-term or mid-term follow-up.” PCI for Cardiogenic Shock: Moving Forward Despite Disappointing Results Identifying Better Ways to Diagnose and Manage Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke Tanveer Rab, MD: “The paper is an excellent review of the outcomes to the CathPCI Registry®. The cardiogenic shock trends are increasing. I would hope, with modern technology, that whatever is accessible to us in the United States—the most advanced technological country in the world—we would be able to make a great impact saving lives. But, unfortunately, that is not the case; that is disappointing. Mary Ann Bauman, MD: “What we’re trying to do is raise awareness about cryptogenic stroke and trying to determine the appropriate protocols so that everyone, wherever you are in this country, will get the same evaluation, because what we’d like to do is take cryptogenic stroke, which means a stroke of unknown cause, and turn it into a known-cause stroke.” A Universal Antidote to Reverse the Anticoagulant Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors Jeffrey W Chambers, MD: “The primary endpoint was 30 days safety and efficacy; we met both those end points by significant margins. Now, we’ve looked at what’s happened over the past 3 years. You want to know if your results are good to begin with and if they hold up over time. Our 3-year results show that we have a target lesion revascularization of 7.8%, a cardiac death rate of 6.7%, and an overall MACE of 23%. Very good results.” 10 CardioSource WorldNews Mark Crowther, MD: “It is super important to have a universal antidote because inhibitors are becoming more and more frequently used in clinical practice. They have really changed the approach to anticoagulation for patients at high risk of blood clots, including patients with atrial fibrillation and deep vein thrombosis.” April 2016