NOTICE TO READER:
As with all of our Q&A sessions, we were not approached or requested to undertake the Q&A but rather we approach those companies that we feel the timing is right. No compensation of any kind or in any form is ever offered, requested, expected, or received.
CCIM: Typically we do not have another Q&A within only a few months of our last one but so much has happened not only with High Hampton (HC) but with the industry itself that in many ways it seems as if that last Q&A may as well have been well over a year ago.
Before we get started, for a good backgrounder I highly recommend
that our readers download your most recent corporate presentation.
Good evening, and thank for you taking time away from your busy schedule to bring our readers to speed on the latest developments.
HC: Louis thanks for having High Hampton back for another Q & A session. I must agree it feels as it has been a year or so since we last talked being that many things have developed such as California now being Recreational, the Cole Memo, State Attorney Generals have voiced their concerns, a multitude of bills introduced at the federal level and clean up language being introduced in California by our regulators and policymakers.
CCIM: Let’s jump right in. When last we spoke, it appeared as though the app-lication process was well underway for the facility in Coachella California (and that it was felt a conditional permit could be granted sometime in the Feb to Apr 2018 time) line – does that remain on track?
HC: Yes, we are on track as we move forward towards our conditional use permit. We have received several favorable reports. We have received comments back from the different departments within the city as well as outside agencies that weigh in on our design-- of which all have been minor comments that do not impact our design significantly.
138
Louis Kyron: CCIM David E. Argudo: HC
Q& A