Campus Review Volume 28 - Issue 9 | September 2018 | Page 6

news What’s God got to do with it? Belief in theistic evolution declining among students. F irst-year biology students are “rapidly abandoning” beliefs in theistic involvement in human origins. That’s according to annual polling of university students on their views about evolution and creationism. Researchers asked UNSW Sydney biology students to circle one of the following: Option 1 – God created people (Homo sapiens) pretty much in their present form at sometime within the last 10,000 years. Option 2 – People developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided the whole process, including our development. Option 3 – People developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life. God had no part in this process. Option 4 – I honestly have no opinion about this matter. Students struggling Many students regularly forced to go without food and other necessities due to financial hardship. “I now often eat meals at university, [and] rely on friends to bring food over or pay for the ingredients so I can cook for them. I don’t eat much anymore…” T he statement above, given to Universities Australia by an Indigenous full-time undergraduate student, is testament to the experiences of many of the nation’s students, according to a new survey by the peak body. About one in seven students regularly go without food and other 4 campusreview.com.au Since the polling began in 1986, the researchers have seen a steep decline in the belief among students that a god is the ultimate or contributing cause of human origins. Conviction that humans evolved without divine involvement of any kind has taken over as the dominant view among students – a quarter selected that option in 1986 but this rose to just under two thirds by 2017. While the percentage of respondents endorsing the creationist option (Option 1) has been consistently small – averaging around 10 per cent in earlier years and slowly declining to less than 5 – in the poll’s first year, 60 per cent of students endorsed either the creationist option or the god-guided evolution option (Option 2) but this has fallen to just under 29 per cent in the latest study. Lead author Professor Michael Archer said the survey’s original intent was to assess the level of commitment among incoming students to supernatural explanations for human origin. “Given that the creationist view (that humans were created by God within the last 10,000 years, rather than evolved naturally over millions of years without the involvement of God) is common among American students, we wanted to know how much of a challenge introducing the evidence for evolution to first-year students would be for us in Australia,” Archer said. “We also wanted to know if Australian student views about this key issue were changing over time.” Publishing the findings in Evolution: Education and Outreach, the report’s authors thanked the secondary school teachers in Australia who “clearly have been doing an increasingly effective job in communicating the scientific facts to high school students about the origin of the natural world”.  ■ necessities because they can’t afford them. This figure was slightly higher for low SES and regional students but jumped to one in four when it came to Indigenous students. Overall, the 2017 UA Student Finances Survey revealed a slight improvement in university students’ financial circumstances since 2012, but UA chief executive Catriona Jackson said financial hardship is still hurting their education. Jackson said many students are deferring studies or reducing their course load for financial reasons. “Education is meant to come first when you are studying, but we know that for some groups of students who live life on the financial edge, that’s just not their reality,” she said. “Our students should have the basic financial security and stability to perform at their best. Yet that’s simply not the case for many students from disadvantaged groups.” The majority of students were supporting themselves through paid work. Most full-time domestic undergrads were doing this with just $18,300 a year. A third regularly missed university lectures or classes because of work. “For some, this is a chance to gain valuable work experience and skills that will help fast-track them into a full-time job after they graduate,” Jackson said. “But for many, the amount of work they need to do to support themselves ... comes at a cost to their studies.” National Union of Students president Mark Pace said allowing students to be priced out of university is against the spirit of Australia’s open higher education system. “The government must prioritise increasing income support to allow students access to higher education and the enormous opportunities it provides for millions of Australians,” Pace said.  ■