Campus Review Volume 28 - Issue 5 | May 2018 | страница 5

news campusreview.com.au Budget 2018-19 A win for universities, a loss for students. By Loren Smith W hile metropolitan and rural universities alike are, for once, mostly pleased with Budget 2018-19, students feel neglected. Tertiary institutions praised, among other measures, the boost in research funding. At the same time, the Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations (CAPA) lamented the budget’s lack of income support for domestic research and postgraduate coursework students. National Union of Students (NUS) president Mark Pace attacked the budget more roundly, likening it to a “war on young people”. UNIVERSITY WINS For universities, research was the main government support theme. Heeding the aims of the National Research Infrastructure Roadmap, $1.9 billion will be invested in this area over 12 years. Medical research, particularly, has been well endowed, with $240 million for the development of innovative medical treatments and devices. Also, the controversial $94 million Murray Darling Medical Schools Network got the budget go-ahead. This means students will be trained in the bush to encourage them to remain there, post-graduation, to plug the rural doctor shortage. The network will not, however, increase the student headcount. What will is $28 million, creating 500 new sub-degree and enabling course places for rural and regional students, plus $14 million for 185 bachelor places in regional ‘study hubs’, in recognition of the recommendations of the Halsey report. States, too, benefitted educationally from the budget, with funding to replenish apprenticeship schemes. Universities Australia president Margaret Gardner called the budgetary announcements “a solid down payment on future economic growth”. “Investing in these facilities is like laying the rail and road networks of the 19th and 20th centuries,” she added. Regional networks, too, were pleased with the budget’s focus on them. Regional Universities Network chair Greg Hill termed the relevant strategies “well targeted and welcome”. Meanwhile, peak STEM body Science & Technology Australia applauded the budget’s stance on research. “The new commitment to $1.9 billion ($1 billion over the forward estimates) in research infrastructure following the National Research Infrastructure Roadmap is very welcome,” CEO Kylie Walker said. However, the praise from universities wasn’t universal. Most, including the Innovative Research Universities (IRU), censured the government’s continuing MYEFO policy of freezing student place funding to 2020. IRU executive director Conor King added “the new charges imposed on universities for students’ access to HELP loans – as well as the full cost of TEQSA reaccreditation – are mean-spirited and pointless”. “This will certainly raise uni expenditure on students, but the additional value for students will be zero.” The National Tertiary Education Union likewise criticised the MYEFO funding freeze status quo. “The unanticipated increase in government revenue could have been used to reverse [that] decision,” president Jeannie Rea suggested. “Right now, young people are facing sustained high youth unemployment rates, worrying spikes in youth homelessness, record low housing affordability and difficulties transitioning from education to work,” she said. “The longer these issues are ignored, the worse they will become. “With an increase in revenue, the government had the opportunity to invest in young Australians and instead they have further mortgaged their future.” CAPA president Natasha Abrahams held a similar view, likening the government’s treatment of young people to ‘ghosting’. The fact that the budget funded only a minority of undergraduate places at “marginal seat universities”, she said, is testament to this. The only positive budgetary offering in her perspective is the financing of the National Research Infrastructure Roadmap. OVERVIEW OF MAIN HIGHER EDUCATION BUDGET MEASURES Additions • $275 million to the Medical Research Future Fund • 185 bachelor degree Commonwealth supported places (CSPs) for the previously announced regional study hubs in 2018–19. This number is set to rise to 500 places a year from 2022 • 500 extra enabling and sub-bachelor places for regional Australians • $37.2 million toward VET student loans compliance and complaints handling • The establishment of a Murray Darling Medical School Network. Cuts/levies • The levying of an annual charge for all HELP providers – including universities – to raise $31 million over four years • A change to funding arrangements for the higher education regulator, TEQSA, to move to a full cost recovery model, raising $28.3 million • A $63 million cut to the Endeavour Scholarships program. STUDENT LOSSES NUS’s Pace said the budget conferred only small benefits to certain student groups. Because of this, he issued a veiled threat to the government: students will respond at the ballot boxes at the next federal election. Katie Acheson, chair of the Australian Youth Affairs Coalition, mostly shared this opinion. Miscellaneous • A review of the Education Services for Overseas Students (ESOS) annual registration charge • Reclaiming unspent funds from Industry Growth Centres and Cooperative Research Centres – a new saving of $20 million over two years.  ■ 3